» Articles » PMID: 28448250

Recruiting Community Partners for Veggie Van: Strategies and Lessons Learned From a Mobile Market Intervention in North Carolina, 2012-2015

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Apr 28
PMID 28448250
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Food access interventions are promising strategies for improving dietary intake, which is associated with better health. However, studies examining the relationship between food access and intake are limited to observational designs, indicating a need for more rigorous approaches. The Veggie Van (VV) program was a cluster-randomized intervention designed to address the gap between food access and intake. In this article, we aim to describe the approaches involved in recruiting community partners to participate in VV.

Community Context: The VV mobile market aimed to improve access to fresh fruits and vegetables by providing subsidized, high-quality, local produce in low-resource communities in North Carolina. This study describes the strategies and considerations involved in recruiting community partners and individual participants for participation in the VV program and evaluation.

Methods: To recruit partners, we used various strategies, including a site screener to identify potential partners, interest forms to gauge future VV use and prioritize enrollment of a high-need population, marketing materials to promote VV, site liaisons to coordinate community outreach, and a memorandum of understanding between all invested parties.

Outcome: A total of 53 community organizations and 725 participants were approached for recruitment. Ultimately, 12 sites and 201 participants were enrolled. Enrollment took 38 months, but our approaches helped successfully recruit a low-income, low-access population. The process took longer than anticipated, and funding constraints prevented certain strategies from being implemented.

Interpretation: Recruiting community partners and members for participation in a multi-level, community-based intervention was challenging. Strategies and lessons learned can inform future studies.

Citing Articles

A Novel Process to Recruit and Select Community Partners for a Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study.

Leone L, Kasprzak C, Lally A, Haynes-Maslow L, Vermont L, Horrigan-Maurer C Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023; 17(1):159-171.

PMID: 37462585 PMC: 10569409. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.2023.0021.


A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Research-Tested Mobile Produce Market Model Designed to Improve Diet in Under-Resourced Communities: Rationale and Design for the Veggie Van Study.

Vermont L, Kasprzak C, Lally A, Claudio A, Tumiel-Berhalter L, Haynes-Maslow L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(16).

PMID: 36011468 PMC: 9408281. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19169832.


Examining commonly used perceived and objective measures of fruit and vegetable access in low-income populations and their association with consumption.

Haynes-Maslow L, McGuirt J, Trippichio G, Armstrong-Brown J, Ammerman A, Leone L Transl Behav Med. 2021; 10(6):1342-1349.

PMID: 33421088 PMC: 7796711. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa077.


Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.

Leone L, Tripicchio G, Haynes-Maslow L, McGuirt J, Grady Smith J, Armstrong-Brown J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):2.

PMID: 29304862 PMC: 5756418. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1.


Best practices for using natural experiments to evaluate retail food and beverage policies and interventions.

Smith Taillie L, Grummon A, Fleischhacker S, Grigsby-Toussaint D, Leone L, Caspi C Nutr Rev. 2017; 75(12):971-989.

PMID: 29190370 PMC: 6280926. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nux051.

References
1.
Belone L, Lucero J, Duran B, Tafoya G, Baker E, Chan D . Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model: Community Partner Consultation and Face Validity. Qual Health Res. 2014; 26(1):117-35. PMC: 4839192. DOI: 10.1177/1049732314557084. View

2.
Story M, Kaphingst K, Robinson-OBrien R, Glanz K . Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007; 29:253-72. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926. View

3.
Bazzano L, He J, Ogden L, Loria C, Vupputuri S, Myers L . Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease in US adults: the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76(1):93-9. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/76.1.93. View

4.
Caspi C, Sorensen G, Subramanian S, Kawachi I . The local food environment and diet: a systematic review. Health Place. 2012; 18(5):1172-87. PMC: 3684395. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.006. View

5.
Minkler M . Community-based research partnerships: challenges and opportunities. J Urban Health. 2005; 82(2 Suppl 2):ii3-12. PMC: 3456439. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/jti034. View