» Articles » PMID: 28447200

Skyline Retention and Retroactive Interference in the Navigating Australian Desert Ant, Melophorus Bagoti

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Apr 28
PMID 28447200
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Visual cues commonly aid solitary foraging ants. Specifically, foragers can use the skyline where terrestrial landmarks meet the sky. Foraging ants show a remarkable affinity to retain these terrestrial cues, developing lifelong memories of the nest site panorama. Here we explore foragers' ability to retain skyline cues of resource locations at some distance from the nest through experiments with artificial skylines erected around a resource location. We also tested the foragers' memories of one skyline at several time points after the skyline was replaced by a different one. During retention testing, foragers appear able to retain robust memories of these skylines over periods (5 days) that surpass their average life span. Exposure to the nest panorama during these periods did not interfere with navigational performance at the distant skyline. Foragers in the replacement experiment initially oriented correctly to both skylines. Thereafter, the foragers' headings in tests with the first skyline gradually shifted away from the correct homeward direction. We argue that new skyline memories cause retroactive interference in the retention of previously learned skylines. Skyline memories may compete during memory retrieval, or may be retrieved in association with context cues present in the current testing paradigm such as vector length.

Citing Articles

Path integration and optic flow in flying insects: a review of current evidence.

Egelhaaf M, Lindemann J J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2025; .

PMID: 40053081 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-025-01734-9.


Varieties of visual navigation in insects.

Freas C, Spetch M Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(1):319-342.

PMID: 36441435 PMC: 9877076. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01720-7.


Sky and Ground Segmentation in the Navigation Visions of the Planetary Rovers.

Kuang B, Rana Z, Zhao Y Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(21).

PMID: 34770302 PMC: 8588092. DOI: 10.3390/s21216996.


Learning walks in an Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti.

Deeti S, Cheng K J Exp Biol. 2021; 224(16).

PMID: 34435625 PMC: 8407660. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.242177.


Terrestrial cue learning and retention during the outbound and inbound foraging trip in the desert ant, Cataglyphis velox.

Freas C, Spetch M J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2019; 205(2):177-189.

PMID: 30689018 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01316-6.


References
1.
Moller R . Insects could exploit UV-green contrast for Landmark navigation. J Theor Biol. 2002; 214(4):619-31. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2484. View

2.
Graham P, Cheng K . Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant?. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2009; 195(7):681-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0443-6. View

3.
Kollmeier T, Roben F, Schenck W, Moller R . Spectral contrasts for landmark navigation. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2006; 24(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1364/josaa.24.000001. View

4.
Narendra A, Cheng K, Wehner R . Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Exp Biol. 2007; 210(Pt 4):570-7. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02678. View

5.
Collett M, Collett T . How do insects use path integration for their navigation?. Biol Cybern. 2000; 83(3):245-59. DOI: 10.1007/s004220000168. View