» Articles » PMID: 28446893

Construction and Validation of the Perceived Opportunity to Craft Scale

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2017 Apr 28
PMID 28446893
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We developed and validated a scale to measure employees' perceived opportunity to craft (POC) in two separate studies conducted in the Netherlands (total = 2329). POC is defined as employees' perception of their opportunity to craft their job. In Study 1, the perceived opportunity to craft scale (POCS) was developed and tested for its factor structure and reliability in an explorative way. Study 2 consisted of confirmatory analyses of the factor structure and reliability of the scale as well as examination of the discriminant and criterion-related validity of the POCS. The results indicated that the scale consists of one dimension and could be reliably measured with five items. Evidence was found for the discriminant validity of the POCS. The scale also showed criterion-related validity when correlated with job crafting (+), job resources (autonomy +; opportunities for professional development +), work engagement (+), and the inactive construct cynicism (-). We discuss the implications of these findings for theory and practice.

Citing Articles

Start Task Crafting, Stay Away from Cyberloafing: The Moderating Role of Supervisor Developmental Feedback.

Hai M, Wu X, Zhou B, Li Y Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39457834 PMC: 11505047. DOI: 10.3390/bs14100960.


When high work engagement is negative for family tasks: mechanisms and boundary conditions.

Onyishi I, Nohe C, Ugwu F, Amazue L, Hertel G Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1403701.

PMID: 38993350 PMC: 11238601. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1403701.


The Holistic Life-Crafting Model: a systematic literature review of meaning-making behaviors.

van Zyl L, Custers N, Dik B, van der Vaart L, Klibert J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1271188.

PMID: 38078256 PMC: 10701914. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1271188.


Evaluating employability in contexts of change: validation of a scale.

Gonzalez-Navarro P, Cordoba-Inesta A, Casino-Garcia A, LLinares-Insa L Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1150008.

PMID: 37593647 PMC: 10428643. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1150008.


Assessing Teaching Compassion, Work Engagement and Compassion Fatigue Among Teachers During the Pandemic.

Fute A, Sun B, Oubibi M Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022; 15:2561-2571.

PMID: 36124334 PMC: 9482458. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S383292.


References
1.
Podsakoff P, Mackenzie S, Lee J, Podsakoff N . Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003; 88(5):879-903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879. View

2.
Wanous J, Reichers A, Hudy M . Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?. J Appl Psychol. 1997; 82(2):247-52. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247. View

3.
Bentler P . Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990; 107(2):238-46. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238. View

4.
Lynn M . Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986; 35(6):382-5. View

5.
Demerouti E, Bakker A, de Jonge J, Janssen P, Schaufeli W . Burnout and engagement at work as a function of demands and control. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001; 27(4):279-86. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.615. View