» Articles » PMID: 28446199

Different Determinants of Exercise Capacity in HFpEF Compared to HFrEF

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Apr 28
PMID 28446199
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Quality of life is as important as survival in heart failure (HF) patients. Controversies exist with regards to echocardiographic determinants of exercise capacity in HF, particularly in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The aim of this study was to prospectively examine echocardiographic parameters that correlate and predict functional exercise capacity assessed by 6 min walk test (6-MWT) in patients with HFpEF.

Methods: In 111 HF patients (mean age 63 ± 10 years, 47% female), an echo-Doppler study and a 6-MWT were performed in the same day. Patients were divided into two groups based on the 6-MWT distance (Group I: ≤ 300 m and Group II: >300 m).

Results: Group I were older (p = 0.008), had higher prevalence of diabetes (p = 0.027), higher baseline heart rate (p = 0.004), larger left atrium - LA (p = 0.001), longer LV filling time - FT (p = 0.019), shorter isovolumic relaxation time (p = 0.037), shorter pulmonary artery acceleration time - PA acceleration time (p = 0.006), lower left atrial lateral wall myocardial velocity (a') (p = 0.018) and lower septal systolic myocardial velocity (s') (p = 0.023), compared with Group II. Patients with HF and reduced EF (HFrEF) had lower hemoglobin (p = 0.007), higher baseline heart rate (p = 0.005), higher NT-ProBNP (p = 0.001), larger LA (p = 0.004), lower septal s', e', a' waves, and septal mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), shorter PA acceleration time (p < 0.001 for all), lower lateral MAPSE, higher E/A & E/e', and shorter LVFT (p = 0.001 for all), lower lateral e' (p = 0.009), s' (p = 0.006), right ventricular e' and LA emptying fraction (p = 0.012 for both), compared with HFpEF patients. In multivariate analysis, only LA diameter [2.676 (1.242-5.766), p = 0.012], and diabetes [0.274 (0.084-0.898), p = 0.033] independently predicted poor 6-MWT performance in the group as a whole. In HFrEF, age [1.073 (1.012-1.137), p = 0.018] and LA diameter [3.685 (1.348-10.071), p = 0.011], but in HFpEF, lateral s' [0.295 (0.099-0.882), p = 0.029], and hemoglobin level [0.497 (0.248-0.998), p = 0.049] independently predicted poor 6-MWT performance.

Conclusions: In HF patients determinants of exercise capacity differ according to severity of overall LV systolic function, with left atrial enlargement in HFrEF and longitudinal systolic shortening in HFpEF as the the main determinants.

Citing Articles

Differentiating Characteristics and Responses to Treatment of New-Onset Heart Failure With Preserved and Reduced Ejection Fraction in Ambulatory Patients.

Alhadramy O, Alahmadi R, Alameen A, Ashmawi N, Alrehaili N, Afandi R Cardiol Res. 2023; 14(3):201-210.

PMID: 37304918 PMC: 10257507. DOI: 10.14740/cr1483.


Reduced functional capacity is associated with the proportion of impaired myocardial deformation assessed in heart failure patients by CMR.

Hashemi D, Doeblin P, Blum M, Weiss K, Schneider M, Beyer R Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1038337.

PMID: 36844739 PMC: 9947709. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1038337.


Diabetes Is the Strongest Predictor of Limited Exercise Capacity in Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF).

Berisha-Muharremi V, Henein M, Dini F, Haliti E, Bytyci I, Ibrahimi P Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:883615.

PMID: 35694665 PMC: 9178085. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.883615.


Left atrial structure and function in heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) versus preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jin X, Nauta J, Hung C, Ouwerkerk W, Teng T, Voors A Heart Fail Rev. 2022; 27(5):1933-1955.

PMID: 35079942 PMC: 9388424. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-021-10204-8.


Obesity and Uncontrolled Diabetes Predict Depression in HF Patients.

Fetahu A, Rrustemi K, Henein M, Bytyci B, Mehmeti F, Bytyci I J Clin Med. 2021; 10(23).

PMID: 34884364 PMC: 8658509. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235663.


References
1.
Berisha V, Bajraktari G, Dobra D, Haliti E, Bajrami R, Elezi S . Echocardiography and 6-minute walk test in left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2009; 92(2):121-34. DOI: 10.1590/s0066-782x2009000200009. View

2.
Guyatt G, Thompson P, BERMAN L, Sullivan M, Townsend M, Jones N . How should we measure function in patients with chronic heart and lung disease?. J Chronic Dis. 1985; 38(6):517-24. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(85)90035-9. View

3.
Guyatt G, Sullivan M, Thompson P, Fallen E, Pugsley S, Taylor D . The 6-minute walk: a new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Can Med Assoc J. 1985; 132(8):919-23. PMC: 1345899. View

4.
Appleton C, Hatle L, Popp R . Relation of transmitral flow velocity patterns to left ventricular diastolic function: new insights from a combined hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 12(2):426-40. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90416-0. View

5.
Galderisi M, Henein M, Dhooge J, Sicari R, Badano L, Zamorano J . Recommendations of the European Association of Echocardiography: how to use echo-Doppler in clinical trials: different modalities for different purposes. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011; 12(5):339-53. DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer051. View