Influence of Contrast Media on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measurements from Routine Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Datasets Using a Phantom-less BMD Measurement Tool
Overview
Radiology
Authors
Affiliations
To evaluate the differences in phantom-less bone mineral density (BMD) measurements in contrast-enhanced routine MDCT scans at different contrast phases, and to develop an algorithm for calculating a reliable BMD value. 112 postmenopausal women from the age of 40 to 77 years (mean age: 57.31 years; SD 9.61) who underwent a clinically indicated MDCT scan, consisting of an unenhanced, an arterial, and a venous phase, were included. A retrospective analysis of the BMD values of the Th12 to L4 vertebrae in each phase was performed using a commercially available phantom-less measurement tool. The mean BMD value in the unenhanced MDCT scans was 79.76 mg/cm³ (SD 31.20), in the arterial phase it was 85.09 mg/cm³ (SD 31.61), and in the venous phase it was 86.18 mg/cm³ (SD 31.30). A significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between BMD values on unenhanced and contrast-enhanced MDCT scans. There was no significant difference between BMD values in the arterial and venous phases (p = 0.228). The following conversion formulas were calculated using linear regression: unenhanced BMD = -2.287 + 0.964 * [arterial BMD value] and -4.517 + 0.978 * [venous BMD value]. The intrarater agreement of BMD measurements was calculated with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.984 and the interobserver reliability was calculated with an ICC of 0.991. Phantom-less BMD measurements in contrast-enhanced MDCT scans result in increased mean BMD values, but, with the formulas applied in our study, a reliable BMD value can be calculated. However, the mean BMD values did not differ significantly between the arterial and venous phases. · BMD can be assessed on routine CT scans using a phantom-less tool.. · i. v. contrast agent significantly elevates BMD values measured on routine CT scans.. · BMD values measured in the arterial and venous phase did not differ significantly.. · Conversion formulas were defined for the calculation of a reliable BMD.. · The phantom-less tool showed good reliability and is a promising method.. · Toelly A, Bardach C, Weber M et al. Influence of Contrast Media on Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measurements from Routine Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Datasets using a Phantom-less BMD Measurement Tool. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 537 - 543.
Shetty L, Nayak K, Priyanka Ethiop J Health Sci. 2025; 34(5):359-364.
PMID: 39944377 PMC: 11811390. DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v34i5.3.
Ahn T, Lee J, Lee J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):28378.
PMID: 39551801 PMC: 11570609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79985-w.
The influence of contrast media on calcium-based imaging of the spine in dual-layer CT.
Rahn S, Skornitzke S, Melzig C, Reiner T, Stiller W, Heussel C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):18898.
PMID: 39143146 PMC: 11324893. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69743-3.
Lu H, Lary C, Hodonsky C, Peyser P, Bos D, van der Laan S J Bone Miner Res. 2024; 39(4):443-452.
PMID: 38477752 PMC: 11262143. DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae022.
Bakhsh N, Banjar M, Baig M PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286395.
PMID: 37289783 PMC: 10249830. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286395.