» Articles » PMID: 28443222

Analysis of Hospital Volume and Factors Influencing Economic Outcomes in Cancer Surgery: Results from a Population-based Study in Korea

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2017 Apr 27
PMID 28443222
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate associations between hospital volume, costs, and length of stay (LOS), and clinical and demographic outcome factors for five types of cancer resection. The main dependent variables were cost and LOS; the primary independent variable was volume.

Methods: Data were obtained from claims submitted to the Korean National Health Insurance scheme. We identified patients who underwent the following surgical procedures: pneumonectomy, colectomy, mastectomy, cystectomy, and esophagectomy. Hospital volumes were divided into quartiles.

Results: Independent predictors of high costs and long LOS included old age, low health insurance contribution, non-metropolitan residents, emergency admission, Charlson score > 2, public hospital ownership, and teaching hospitals. After adjusting for relevant factors, there was an inverse relationship between volume and costs/LOS. The highest volume hospitals had the lowest procedure costs and LOS. However, this was not observed for cystectomy.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest an association between patient and clinical factors and greater costs and LOS per surgical oncologic procedure, with the exception of cystectomy. Yet, there were no clear associations between hospitals' cost of care and risk-adjusted mortality.

Citing Articles

Impact of hospital volume on failure to rescue for complications requiring reoperation after elective colorectal surgery: multicentre propensity score-matched cohort study.

Gronroos-Korhonen M, Koskenvuo L, Mentula P, Nykanen T, Koskensalo S, Leppaniemi A BJS Open. 2024; 8(2).

PMID: 38597158 PMC: 11004787. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae025.


Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.

Bayat Z, Guidolin K, Elsolh B, De Castro C, Kennedy E, Govindarajan A BJS Open. 2022; 6(5).

PMID: 36124901 PMC: 9487584. DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac110.


Volume-outcome relationships in laryngeal trauma processes of care: a retrospective cohort study.

Forner D, Noel C, Guttman M, Haas B, Enepekides D, Rigby M Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022; 48(5):4131-4141.

PMID: 35320370 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-01950-x.


What Matters in the Performance of a Medial Institution?.

Cho H, Chu C Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017; 8(1):1-2.

PMID: 28443218 PMC: 5402842. DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.1.01.

References
1.
Taub D, Miller D, Cowan J, Dimick J, Montie J, Wei J . Impact of surgical volume on mortality and length of stay after nephrectomy. Urology. 2004; 63(5):862-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.11.037. View

2.
Lien Y, Huang M, Lin H . Association between surgeon and hospital volume and in-hospital fatalities after lung cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 83(5):1837-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.008. View

3.
Birkmeyer J, Siewers A, Finlayson E, Stukel T, Lucas F, Batista I . Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(15):1128-37. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337. View

4.
Ho V, Aloia T . Hospital volume, surgeon volume, and patient costs for cancer surgery. Med Care. 2008; 46(7):718-25. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181653d6b. View

5.
Aranda M, McGory M, Sekeris E, Maggard M, Ko C, Zingmond D . Do racial/ethnic disparities exist in the utilization of high-volume surgeons for women with ovarian cancer?. Gynecol Oncol. 2008; 111(2):166-72. PMC: 4535425. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.009. View