The Contribution of Phonological Awareness to Reading Fluency and Its Individual Sub-skills in Readers Aged 9- to 12-years

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2017 Apr 27

PMID 28443048

Citations 6

Authors

Zena Elhassan

Sheila G Crewther

Edith L Bavin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Research examining phonological awareness (PA) contributions to reading in established readers of different skill levels is limited. The current study examined the contribution of PA to phonological decoding, visual word recognition, reading rate, and reading comprehension in 124 fourth to sixth grade children (aged 9-12 years). On the basis of scores on the FastaReada measure of reading fluency participants were allocated to one of three reading ability categories: dysfluent ( = 47), moderate ( = 38) and fluent ( = 39). For the dysfluent group, PA contributed significantly to all reading measures except rate, but in the moderate group only to phonological decoding. PA did not influence performances on any of the reading measures examined for the fluent reader group. The results support the notion that fluency is characterized by a shift from conscious decoding to rapid and accurate visual recognition of words. Although PA may be influential in reading development, the results of the current study show that it is not sufficient for fluent reading.

Citing Articles

Phonological awareness training and phonological therapy approaches for specific language impairment children with speech sound disorders: a comparative outcome study.

Farag H, Eldessouky H, Shahin E, Atef M Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023; 281(1):479-487.

PMID: 37943316 PMC: 10764452. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08274-5.

Assessing phonological short-term memory in Greek: Reliability and validity of a non-word repetition test.

Talli I, Kotsoni P, Stavrakaki S, Sprenger-Charolles L Front Psychol. 2023; 13:904268.

PMID: 36896028 PMC: 9990871. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904268.

Higher maternal education is related to negative functional connectivity between attention system networks and reading-related regions in children with reading difficulties compared to typical readers.

Greenwood P, Dudley J, Hutton J, DiFrancesco M, Farah R, Horowitz-Kraus T Brain Res. 2021; 1766:147532.

PMID: 34033755 PMC: 8214310. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147532.

Differences and Similarities in the Contributions of Phonological Awareness, Orthographic Knowledge and Semantic Competence to Reading Fluency in Chinese School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss.

Zhang L, Hong T, Li Y, Wang J, Zhang Y, Shu H Front Psychol. 2021; 12:649375.

PMID: 33967910 PMC: 8100657. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.649375.

Cortical tracking of speech in noise accounts for reading strategies in children.

Destoky F, Bertels J, Niesen M, Wens V, Vander Ghinst M, Leybaert J PLoS Biol. 2020; 18(8):e3000840.

PMID: 32845876 PMC: 7478533. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000840.

References

Elhassan Z, Crewther S, Bavin E, Crewther D . Preliminary validation of FastaReada as a measure of reading fluency. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1634. PMC: 4621297. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01634. View

Dietz N, Jones K, Gareau L, Zeffiro T, Eden G . Phonological decoding involves left posterior fusiform gyrus. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005; 26(2):81-93. PMC: 6871728. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20122. View

Snowling M, Gallagher A, Frith U . Family risk of dyslexia is continuous: individual differences in the precursors of reading skill. Child Dev. 2003; 74(2):358-73. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402003. View

Share D . Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition. 1995; 55(2):151-218; discussion 219-26. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2. View

Katzir T, Kim Y, Wolf M, OBrien B, Kennedy B, Lovett M . Reading fluency: the whole is more than the parts. Ann Dyslexia. 2007; 56(1):51-82. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-006-0003-5. View

Rayner K, Foorman B, Perfetti C, Pesetsky D, Seidenberg M . How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychol Sci. 2002; 2(2 Suppl):31-74. DOI: 10.1111/1529-1006.00004.. View

Ziegler J, Goswami U . Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychol Bull. 2005; 131(1):3-29. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3. View

Ferrer E, Shaywitz B, Holahan J, Marchione K, Shaywitz S . Uncoupling of reading and IQ over time: empirical evidence for a definition of dyslexia. Psychol Sci. 2010; 21(1):93-101. DOI: 10.1177/0956797609354084. View

Share D . On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: the perils of overreliance on an "outlier" orthography. Psychol Bull. 2008; 134(4):584-615. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.584. View

10.

Schuster S, Hawelka S, Hutzler F, Kronbichler M, Richlan F . Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26(10):3889-3904. PMC: 5028003. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw184. View

11.

Castles A, Coltheart M . Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition. 1993; 47(2):149-80. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90003-e. View

12.

Casalis S, Cole P, Sopo D . Morphological awareness in developmental dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 2005; 54(1):114-38. DOI: 10.1007/s11881-004-0006-z. View

13.

Share D . Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2008; 36:31-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)00002-5. View

14.

Vellutino F, Fletcher J, Snowling M, Scanlon D . Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004; 45(1):2-40. DOI: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x. View

15.

Munson B, Edwards J, Beckman M . Relationships between nonword repetition accuracy and other measures of linguistic development in children with phonological disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2005; 48(1):61-78. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2005/006). View

16.

De Luca M, Burani C, Paizi D, Spinelli D, Zoccolotti P . Letter and letter-string processing in developmental dyslexia. Cortex. 2009; 46(10):1272-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.007. View

17.

Edwards J, Beckman M, Munson B . The interaction between vocabulary size and phonotactic probability effects on children's production accuracy and fluency in nonword repetition. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47(2):421-36. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/034). View

18.

Reichle E, Rayner K, Pollatsek A . The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models. Behav Brain Sci. 2004; 26(4):445-76. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x03000104. View

19.

Vaessen A, Blomert L . Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010; 105(3):213-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.005. View

20.

BODER E . Developmental dyslexia: a diagnostic approach based on three atypical reading-spelling patterns. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1973; 15(5):663-87. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1973.tb05180.x. View