How Embarrassing! The Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Processing Social Norm Violations

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2017 Apr 26

PMID 28441460

Citations 16

Authors

Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam

Henk van Steenbergen

Tanja Kreuk

Nic J A Van der Wee

P Michiel Westenberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Social norms are important for human social interactions, and violations of these norms are evaluated partly on the intention of the actor. Here, we describe the revised Social Norm Processing Task (SNPT-R), a paradigm enabling the study of behavioral and neural responses to intended and unintended social norm violations among both adults and adolescents. We investigated how participants (adolescents and adults, n = 87) rate intentional and unintentional social norm violations with respect to inappropriateness and embarrassment, and we examined the brain activation patterns underlying the processing of these transgressions in an independent sample of 21 adults using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). We hypothesized to find activation within the medial prefrontal cortex, temporo-parietal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex in response to both intentional and unintentional social norm violations, with more pronounced activation for the intentional social norm violations in these regions and in the amygdala. Participants' ratings confirmed the hypothesis that the three types of stories are evaluated differently with respect to intentionality: intentional social norm violations were rated as the most inappropriate and most embarrassing. Furthermore, fMRI results showed that reading stories on intentional and unintentional social norm violations evoked activation within the frontal pole, the paracingulate gyrus and the superior frontal gyrus. In addition, processing unintentional social norm violations was associated with activation in, among others, the orbitofrontal cortex, middle frontal gyrus and superior parietal lobule, while reading intentional social norm violations was related to activation in the left amygdala. These regions have been previously implicated in thinking about one's self, thinking about others and moral reasoning. Together, these findings indicate that the SNPT-R could serve as a useful paradigm for examining social norm processing, both at the behavioral and the neural level.

Citing Articles

Civilian Moral Injury and Amygdala Functional Connectivity During Attention to Threat.

Fulton T, Lathan E, Karkare M, Guelfo A, Eghbalzad L, Ahluwalia V Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023; 9(1):112-120.

PMID: 37487958 PMC: 10803642. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.07.006.

Associations Between Childhood Area-Level Social Fragmentation, Maladaptation to School, and Social Functioning Among Healthy Youth and Those at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.

Ku B, Addington J, Bearden C, Cadenhead K, Cannon T, Compton M Schizophr Bull. 2023; 49(6):1437-1446.

PMID: 37358832 PMC: 10686327. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbad093.

The Neural Signatures of Shame, Embarrassment, and Guilt: A Voxel-Based Meta-Analysis on Functional Neuroimaging Studies.

Piretti L, Pappaianni E, Garbin C, Rumiati R, Job R, Grecucci A Brain Sci. 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 37190524 PMC: 10136704. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040559.

Neural mechanisms of brand love relationship dynamics: Is the development of brand love relationships the same as that of interpersonal romantic love relationships?.

Watanuki S Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:984647.

PMID: 36440289 PMC: 9686448. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.984647.

How do children adapt their fairness norm? Evidence from computational modeling.

Morasse F, Beauchamp M, Desilets E, Hetu S PLoS One. 2022; 17(11):e0277508.

PMID: 36383514 PMC: 9668110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277508.

References

Heimberg R, Horner K, Juster H, Safren S, Brown E, Schneier F . Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Psychol Med. 1999; 29(1):199-212. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291798007879. View

Woolrich M . Robust group analysis using outlier inference. Neuroimage. 2008; 41(2):286-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.042. View

Morey R, McCarthy G, Selgrade E, Seth S, Nasser J, LaBar K . Neural systems for guilt from actions affecting self versus others. Neuroimage. 2012; 60(1):683-92. PMC: 3288150. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.069. View

Jenkinson M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Woolrich M, Smith S . FSL. Neuroimage. 2011; 62(2):782-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. View

Blair K, Geraci M, Hollon N, Otero M, DeVido J, Majestic C . Social norm processing in adult social phobia: atypically increased ventromedial frontal cortex responsiveness to unintentional (embarrassing) transgressions. Am J Psychiatry. 2010; 167(12):1526-32. PMC: 3175630. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09121797. View

Smith S, Jenkinson M, Woolrich M, Beckmann C, Behrens T, Johansen-Berg H . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:S208-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051. View

Ruff C, Ugazio G, Fehr E . Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science. 2013; 342(6157):482-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1241399. View

Stein M, Stein D . Social anxiety disorder. Lancet. 2008; 371(9618):1115-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60488-2. View

Feinberg M, Willer R, Keltner D . Flustered and faithful: embarrassment as a signal of prosociality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 102(1):81-97. DOI: 10.1037/a0025403. View

10.

Zahn R, Moll J, Paiva M, Garrido G, Krueger F, Huey E . The neural basis of human social values: evidence from functional MRI. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(2):276-83. PMC: 2733324. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn080. View

11.

Haller S, Cohen Kadosh K, Scerif G, Lau J . Social anxiety disorder in adolescence: How developmental cognitive neuroscience findings may shape understanding and interventions for psychopathology. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015; 13:11-20. PMC: 6989773. DOI: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.02.002. View

12.

Moll J, de Oliveira-Souza R, Bramati I, Grafman J . Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments. Neuroimage. 2002; 16(3 Pt 1):696-703. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1118. View

13.

Crone E, Dahl R . Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13(9):636-50. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3313. View

14.

Rapee R, Spence S . The etiology of social phobia: empirical evidence and an initial model. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004; 24(7):737-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.06.004. View

15.

Berthoz S, Armony J, Blair R, Dolan R . An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms. Brain. 2002; 125(Pt 8):1696-708. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf190. View

16.

Borg J, Hynes C, Van Horn J, Grafton S, Sinnott-Armstrong W . Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: an FMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(5):803-17. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.803. View

17.

Sanfey A, Stallen M, Chang L . Norms and expectations in social decision-making. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014; 18(4):172-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.01.011. View

18.

McLatchie N, Giner-Sorolla R, Derbyshire S . 'Imagined guilt' vs 'recollected guilt': implications for fMRI. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016; 11(5):703-11. PMC: 4847697. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw001. View

19.

Carleton R, McCreary D, Norton P, Asmundson G . Brief fear of negative evaluation scale-revised. Depress Anxiety. 2006; 23(5):297-303. DOI: 10.1002/da.20142. View

20.

Chakroff A, Dungan J, Koster-Hale J, Brown A, Saxe R, Young L . When minds matter for moral judgment: intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015; 11(3):476-84. PMC: 4769633. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsv131. View