» Articles » PMID: 28435632

Anatomical Considerations for Insertion of Pedicular Screw in Cervicothoracic Junction

Overview
Journal Iran J Neurol
Date 2017 Apr 25
PMID 28435632
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the pedicle dimension and angulation in cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) using the findings of computed tomographic (CT) to help accurate insertion of pedicular screw. Forty three patients with high quality CT images of CTJ were evaluated. Pedicle width (PW), pedicle height (PH), pedicle axis length (PAL), transverse angle (TA) and sagittal angle (SA) were measured bilaterally from C6 to T2. Mean PW was 5.3 mm at C6, 6.2 mm at C7, 8.1 mm at T1 and 6.5 mm at T2. Males had larger pedicles than females. PH was greater than PW in all vertebrae. SA was relatively constant and around 15 degrees to horizontal plane. There was high variability of vertebral characteristics especially in PAL and TA. Small diameter screws must be used for pedicular fixation in CTJ. Because of high variability of pedicle morphometry, CT scan is recommended in all patients before instrumentation.

Citing Articles

Pedicle morphometry of the C7 and T1 vertebrae in an argentine population.

Devoto P, Minghinelli F, Mezzadri J, Pipolo D, Lacsi M, Jalon P Surg Neurol Int. 2024; 15:295.

PMID: 39246794 PMC: 11380883. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_356_2024.

References
1.
Jarvers J, Katscher S, Franck A, Glasmacher S, Schmidt C, Blattert T . 3D-based navigation in posterior stabilisations of the cervical and thoracic spine: problems and benefits. Results of 451 screws. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016; 37(2):109-19. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-011-0098-1. View

2.
Ishikawa Y, Kanemura T, Yoshida G, Matsumoto A, Ito Z, Tauchi R . Intraoperative, full-rotation, three-dimensional image (O-arm)-based navigation system for cervical pedicle screw insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 15(5):472-8. DOI: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10809. View

3.
Chanplakorn P, Kraiwattanapong C, Aroonjarattham K, Leelapattana P, Keorochana G, Jaovisidha S . Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical spine using multi-detector computerized tomography (MD-CT) scan: the consideration for cervical pedicle screws fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15:125. PMC: 3991875. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-125. View

4.
Gonzalvo A, Fitt G, Liew S, de la Harpe D, Vrodos N, McDonald M . Correlation between pedicle size and the rate of pedicle screw misplacement in the treatment of thoracic fractures: Can we predict how difficult the task will be?. Br J Neurosurg. 2015; 29(4):508-12. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1019414. View

5.
Jones E, Heller J, Silcox D, Hutton W . Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(9):977-82. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00009. View