» Articles » PMID: 28435273

An Innovative Nonpharmacological Intervention Combined with Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia Increased Patient Global Improvement in Pain and Satisfaction After Major Surgery

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Apr 25
PMID 28435273
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether a nonpharmacological approach through implementation of a communication improvement program (named CICARE for Connect, Introduce, Communicate, Ask, Respond and Exit) into standard operating procedure (SOP) in acute pain service (APS) improved satisfaction in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA).

Patients And Methods: This was a nonrandomized before-after study. Adult patients (aged between 20 and 80 years) who received IV-PCA after major surgery were included. Implementing CICARE into SOP was conducted in APS. Anonymous questionnaires were used to measure outcomes in this prospective two-part survey. The first part completed by APS nurses contained patients' characteristics, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, IV-PCA side effects and pain at rest measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10). A score of NRS ≥4 was defined as inadequately treated pain. The ten-question second part was completed by patients voluntarily after IV-PCA was discontinued. Each question was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale (1: extremely poor; 5: excellent). Patients were separated into "before" and "after" CICARE groups. Primary outcomes were patient global impression of improvement in pain (PGI-Improvement) and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included quality of communication skills, instrument proficiency and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA.

Results: The response rate was 55.3%, with 187 usable questionnaires. CICARE effectively improved patient global impression of improvement in pain, patient satisfaction, communication skills and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA. No significant differences were noted in instrument proficiency, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, rates of inadequately treated pain at rest and side effects of IV-PCA between groups. Paradoxical findings were noted between the rates of inadequately treated pain/side effects and PGI-Improvement in pain/patient satisfaction, which were affected by psychological factors.

Conclusion: Nonpharmacological interventions carried out by implementing CICARE into SOP for APS effectively improved patient satisfaction and postoperative pain management quality, but this did not affect actual pain.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of use of nonpharmacological methods of pain relief among patients following onco surgeries - A prospective, observational cohort study from a single center.

Bakshi S, Arya K, Dhurwe B J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2025; 40(4):588-597.

PMID: 39759047 PMC: 11694864. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_198_22.


Effect of CICARE communication nursing model combined with motivational psychological intervention in patients with post-intensive care unit syndrome.

She S, Xu Y World J Psychiatry. 2023; 13(9):707-713.

PMID: 37771643 PMC: 10523197. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i9.707.

References
1.
Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N . Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Fam Pract. 2000; 17 Suppl 1:S11-6. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.suppl_1.s11. View

2.
Rothman M, Vallow S, Damaraju C, Hewitt D . Using the patient global assessment of the method of pain control to assess new analgesic modalities in clinical trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 25(6):1433-43. DOI: 10.1185/03007990902862032. View

3.
Schoenfelder T, Klewer J, Kugler J . Determinants of patient satisfaction: a study among 39 hospitals in an in-patient setting in Germany. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011; 23(5):503-9. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr038. View

4.
Sullivan G, Artino Jr A . Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2014; 5(4):541-2. PMC: 3886444. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. View

5.
Breivik H, Borchgrevink P, Allen S, Rosseland L, Romundstad L, Hals E . Assessment of pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008; 101(1):17-24. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aen103. View