» Articles » PMID: 28432409

Innovative Treatment Modalities for Urinary Incontinence: a European Survey Identifying Experience and Attitude of Healthcare Providers

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2017 Apr 23
PMID 28432409
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Hypothesis: Urinary incontinence is a common condition in women, with a reported prevalence ranging from 25% to 51%. Of these women, an estimated 38% suffer from stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A European research consortium is investigating an innovative system based on information and communication technology for the conservative treatment of women with SUI. When introducing a new intervention, implementation barriers arise and need to be identified. Therefore, we investigated healthcare providers' experience with and attitude towards innovative care options.

Methods: We performed an online survey to assess (1) the characteristics and practice of healthcare providers, (2) current protocols for SUI, (3) current use of biofeedback, and (4) knowledge about serious gaming. The survey was sent to members of professional societies in Europe (EUGA), UK (BSUG) and The Netherlands (DPFS).

Results: Of 341 questionnaires analyzed (response rate between 18% and 30%), 64% of the respondents had access to a protocol for the treatment of SUI, and 31% used biofeedback when treating patients with SUI. However, 92% considered that biofeedback has a clear or probable added value, and 97% of those who did not use biofeedback would change their practice if research evidence supported its use. Finally, 89% of respondents indicated that they had no experience of serious gaming, but 92% considered that it could be useful.

Conclusions: Although inexperienced, European urogynecologists and physical therapists welcome innovative treatment options for the conservative treatment of SUI such as portable wireless biofeedback and serious gaming. Scientific evidence is considered a prerequisite to incorporate such innovations into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for women with urinary incontinence: the OPAL RCT.

Hagen S, Bugge C, Dean S, Elders A, Hay-Smith J, Kilonzo M Health Technol Assess. 2020; 24(70):1-144.

PMID: 33289476 PMC: 7768330. DOI: 10.3310/hta24700.


Mixed feelings: general practitioners' attitudes towards eHealth for stress urinary incontinence - a qualitative study.

Firet L, de Bree C, Verhoeks C, Teunissen D, Lagro-Janssen A BMC Fam Pract. 2019; 20(1):21.

PMID: 30684962 PMC: 6347743. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-019-0907-x.

References
1.
Krebs P, Duncan D . Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(4):e101. PMC: 4704953. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.4924. View

2.
Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J . The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25(2):81-97. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00777.x. View

3.
Read J, Shortell S . Interactive games to promote behavior change in prevention and treatment. JAMA. 2011; 305(16):1704-5. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.408. View

4.
Herderschee R, Hay-Smith E, Herbison G, Roovers J, Heineman M . Feedback or biofeedback to augment pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (7):CD009252. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252. View

5.
Fitz F, Magalhaes Resende A, Stupp L, Sartori M, Girao M, Castro R . Biofeedback for the treatment of female pelvic floor muscle dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23(11):1495-516. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1707-1. View