» Articles » PMID: 28424762

Assessment of Sensory Processing Characteristics in Children Between 3 and 11 Years Old: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28424762
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The assessment of sensory perception, discrimination, integration, modulation, praxis, and other motor skills, such as posture, balance, and bilateral motor coordination, is necessary to identify the sensory and motor factors influencing the development of personal autonomy. The aim of this work is to study the assessment tools currently available for identifying different patterns of sensory processing. There are 15 tests available that have psychometric properties, primarily for the US population. Nine of them apply to children in preschool and up to grade 12. The assessment of sensory processing is a process that includes the use of standardized tests, administration of caregiver questionnaires, and clinical observations. The review of different studies using PRISMA criteria or Osteba Critical Appraisal Cards reveals that the most commonly used tools are the Sensory Integration and Praxis Test, the Sensory Processing Measure, and the Sensory Profile.

Citing Articles

Psychometric properties of Child Sensory Profile-2 (CSP-2) among children with spastic cerebral palsy.

Dhiman S, Goyal R, Ajmera P, Gulati S Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184(1):121.

PMID: 39776282 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-024-05963-z.


Exploring the Association between Parental Employment Status, Education Level, and Sensory Reactivity in Spanish Children Aged 3-7 Years: Findings from the InProS Study.

Munoz-Sanchez R, Hurtado-Pomares M, Juarez-Leal I, Pinero J, Navarrete-Munoz E, Valera-Gran D Children (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39062304 PMC: 11275636. DOI: 10.3390/children11070855.


Adaptation of a Sensory Reactivity Assessment for Use With Children in the Western Cape Province, South Africa.

Watkyns A, Cloete L, Parham L Occup Ther Int. 2024; 2024:5921153.

PMID: 39055325 PMC: 11272402. DOI: 10.1155/2024/5921153.


Sensory experiences questionnaire unravels differences in sensory profiles between MECP2-related disorders.

Suter B, Pehlivan D, Ak M, Harris H, Lyons-Warren A Autism Res. 2024; 17(4):775-784.

PMID: 38433353 PMC: 11127745. DOI: 10.1002/aur.3112.


Investigation of the Relationship between Sensory-Processing Skills and Motor Functions in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Erkek S, Cekmece C Children (Basel). 2023; 10(11).

PMID: 38002814 PMC: 10670370. DOI: 10.3390/children10111723.


References
1.
Miller L, Nielsen D, Schoen S . Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and sensory modulation disorder: a comparison of behavior and physiology. Res Dev Disabil. 2012; 33(3):804-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.12.005. View

2.
Davies P, Gavin W . Validating the diagnosis of sensory processing disorders using EEG technology. Am J Occup Ther. 2007; 61(2):176-89. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.61.2.176. View

3.
Lai C, Chung J, Chan C, Li-Tsang C . Sensory processing measure-HK Chinese version: psychometric properties and pattern of response across environments. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32(6):2636-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.06.010. View

4.
Schoen S, Miller L, Sullivan J . Measurement in Sensory Modulation: the Sensory Processing Scale Assessment. Am J Occup Ther. 2014; 68(5):522-30. PMC: 4153553. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.2014.012377. View

5.
Ayres A, Tickle L . Hyper-responsivity to touch and vestibular stimuli as a predictor of positive response to sensory integration procedures by autistic children. Am J Occup Ther. 1980; 34(6):375-81. DOI: 10.5014/ajot.34.6.375. View