» Articles » PMID: 28424659

Online Measurement of Microembolic Signal Burden by Transcranial Doppler During Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation-Results of a Multicenter Trial

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Apr 21
PMID 28424659
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Left atrial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an accepted treatment option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). This procedure can be complicated by stroke or silent cerebral embolism. Online measurement of microembolic signals (MESs) by transcranial Doppler (TCD) may be useful for characterizing thromboembolic burden during PVI. In this prospective multicenter trial, we investigated the burden, characteristics, and composition of MES during left atrial catheter ablation using a variety of catheter technologies.

Materials And Methods: PVI was performed in a total of 42 patients using the circular-shaped multielectrode pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) technology in 23, an irrigated radiofrequency (IRF) in 14, and the cryoballoon (CB) technology in 5 patients. TCD was used to detect the total MES burden and sustained thromboembolic showers (TESs) of >30 s. During TES, the site of ablation within the left atrium was registered. MES composition was classified manually into "solid," "gaseous," or "equivocal" by off-line expert assessment.

Results: The total MES burden was higher when using IRF compared to CB (2,336 ± 1,654 vs. 593 ± 231;  = 0.007) and showed a tendency toward a higher burden when using IRF compared to PVAC (2,336 ± 1,654 vs. 1,685 ± 2,255;  = 0.08). TES occurred more often when using PVAC compared to IRF (1.5 ± 2 vs. 0.4 ± 1.3;  = 0.04) and most frequently when ablation was performed close to the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV). Of the MES, 17.004 (23%) were characterized as definitely solid, 13.204 (18%) as clearly gaseous, and 44.366 (59%) as equivocal.

Discussion: We investigated the burden and characteristics of MES during left atrial catheter ablation for AF. All ablation techniques applied in this study generated a relevant number of MES. There was a significant difference in total MES burden using IRF compared to CB and a tendency toward a higher burden using IRF compared to PVAC. The highest TES burden was found in the PVAC group, particularly during ablation close to the LSPV. The composition of thromboembolic particles was balanced. The impact of MES, TES, and composition of thromboembolic particles on neurological outcome needs to be evaluated further. (Clinical Trial Registration: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, https://drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00003465. DRKS00003465.).

Citing Articles

Microembolizations in the arterial cerebral circulation during atrial fibrillation ablation: cryoballoon technique advantages and neurocognitive safety-results of a prospective observational study.

Erkapic D, Roussopoulos K, Aleksic M, Weipert K, Sozener K, Kostev K Europace. 2024; 26(9).

PMID: 39180328 PMC: 11411211. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae222.


Cerebral embolisation during transcatheter edge-to-edge repair of the mitral valve with the MitraClip system: a prospective, observational study.

Braemswig T, Kusserow M, Kruppa J, Reinthaler M, Erdur H, Fritsch M EuroIntervention. 2021; 18(2):e160-e168.

PMID: 34916177 PMC: 9904372. DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00646.


Cerebral microembolism during atrial fibrillation ablation can result from the technical aspects and mostly does not cause permanent neurological deficit.

Lasek-Bal A, Puz P, Wieczorek J, Nowak S, Wnuk-Wojnar A, Warsz-Wianecka A Arch Med Sci. 2020; 16(6):1288-1294.

PMID: 33224327 PMC: 7667434. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.94747.


The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

Kece F, Zeppenfeld K, Trines S Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2018; 7(3):169-180.

PMID: 30416730 PMC: 6141930. DOI: 10.15420/aer.2018.7.3.

References
1.
Kiss A, Nagy-Balo E, Sandorfi G, Edes I, Csanadi Z . Cerebral microembolization during atrial fibrillation ablation: comparison of different single-shot ablation techniques. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 174(2):276-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.175. View

2.
Markus H, Punter M . Can transcranial Doppler discriminate between solid and gaseous microemboli? Assessment of a dual-frequency transducer system. Stroke. 2005; 36(8):1731-4. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000173399.20127.b3. View

3.
Vukovic-Cvetkovic V . Microembolus detection by transcranial Doppler sonography: review of the literature. Stroke Res Treat. 2011; 2012:382361. PMC: 3236352. DOI: 10.1155/2012/382361. View

4.
Nagy-Balo E, Tint D, Clemens M, Beke I, Kovacs K, Csiba L . Transcranial measurement of cerebral microembolic signals during pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison of two ablation techniques. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013; 6(3):473-80. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.971747. View

5.
Kilicaslan F, Verma A, Saad E, Rossillo A, Davis D, Prasad S . Transcranial Doppler detection of microembolic signals during pulmonary vein antrum isolation: implications for titration of radiofrequency energy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006; 17(5):495-501. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00451.x. View