» Articles » PMID: 28421616

The Validity of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in an Inpatient Sample with Alcohol Dependence

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2017 Apr 20
PMID 28421616
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is commonly used to examine depressive symptoms in clinical settings, including facilities treating patients for alcohol addiction. No studies have examined the validity of the MADRS compared to an established clinical diagnostic tool of depression in this population. This study aimed to examine the following: (i) the validity of the MADRS compared to a clinical diagnosis of a depressive disorder (using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR [SCID-IV-TR]) in patients seeking treatment for alcohol dependence (AD); (ii) whether the validity of the MADRS differs by type of SCID-IV-TR-based diagnosis of depression; and (iii) which items contribute to the optimal predictive model of the MADRS compared to a SCID-IV-TR diagnosis of a depressive disorder.

Methods: Individuals seeking treatment for AD and admitted to an inpatient unit were administered the MADRS at day 2 of their detoxification program. Clinical diagnoses of AD and depression were made via the SCID-IV-TR at the beginning of treatment.

Results: In total, 803 participants were included in the study. The MADRS demonstrated low overall accuracy relative to the clinical diagnosis of depression with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.68. The optimal threshold for balancing sensitivity and specificity identified by the Euclidean distance was >14. This cut-point demonstrated a sensitivity of 66%, a specificity of 60%, a positive predictive value of 50%, and a negative predictive value of 75%. The MADRS performed slightly better for major depressive disorders compared to alcohol-induced depression. Items related to lassitude, concentration, and appetite slightly decreased the accuracy of the MADRS.

Conclusions: The MADRS does not appear to be an appropriate substitute for a diagnostic tool among alcohol-dependent patients. The MADRS may, however, still be a useful screening tool assuming careful consideration of cut-points.

Citing Articles

Evolution of Cognitive Impairments in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results from the Longitudinal French Centers of Expertise for Treatment-Resistant Depression (FACE-DR) Cohort.

Vancappel A, Dansou Y, Godin O, Haffen E, Yrondi A, Stephan F Brain Sci. 2023; 13(7).

PMID: 37509050 PMC: 10377578. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071120.


Design, implementation and preliminary results of a type-2 hybrid cluster-randomized trial of integrating screening and treatment for major depressive disorder into specialty clinics providing opioid agonist therapies in Ukraine.

Machavariani E, Bromberg D, Dumchev K, Dvoriak S, Zeziulin O, Morozova O Contemp Clin Trials. 2023; 131:107248.

PMID: 37263492 PMC: 10527419. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107248.


Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians.

Nahm F Korean J Anesthesiol. 2022; 75(1):25-36.

PMID: 35124947 PMC: 8831439. DOI: 10.4097/kja.21209.


Non-pharmacological treatment of gambling disorder: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Ribeiro E, Afonso N, Morgado P BMC Psychiatry. 2021; 21(1):105.

PMID: 33596853 PMC: 7888125. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-021-03097-2.


Mechanism and therapeutic strategies of depression after myocardial infarction.

Yang Y, Li X, Chen S, Xiao M, Liu Z, Li J Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021; 238(6):1401-1415.

PMID: 33594503 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05784-0.

References
1.
Leentjens A, Verhey F, Lousberg R, Spitsbergen H, Wilmink F . The validity of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scales as screening and diagnostic tools for depression in Parkinson's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000; 15(7):644-9. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1166(200007)15:7<644::aid-gps167>3.0.co;2-l. View

2.
Muller M, Szegedi A, WETZEL H, Benkert O . Moderate and severe depression. Gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. J Affect Disord. 2000; 60(2):137-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00162-7. View

3.
Hawley C, Gale T, Sivakumaran T . Defining remission by cut off score on the MADRS: selecting the optimal value. J Affect Disord. 2002; 72(2):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00451-7. View

4.
Muller M, Himmerich H, Kienzle B, Szegedi A . Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS). J Affect Disord. 2003; 77(3):255-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00120-9. View

5.
Gual A, Balcells M, Torres M, Madrigal M, Diez T, Serrano L . Sertraline for the prevention of relapse in detoxicated alcohol dependent patients with a comorbid depressive disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Alcohol Alcohol. 2003; 38(6):619-25. DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agg124. View