» Articles » PMID: 28421089

Using a Structural Root System Model to Evaluate and Improve the Accuracy of Root Image Analysis Pipelines

Overview
Journal Front Plant Sci
Date 2017 Apr 20
PMID 28421089
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Root system analysis is a complex task, often performed with fully automated image analysis pipelines. However, the outcome is rarely verified by ground-truth data, which might lead to underestimated biases. We have used a root model, ArchiSimple, to create a large and diverse library of ground-truth root system images (10,000). For each image, three levels of noise were created. This library was used to evaluate the accuracy and usefulness of several image descriptors classically used in root image analysis softwares. Our analysis highlighted that the accuracy of the different traits is strongly dependent on the quality of the images and the type, size, and complexity of the root systems analyzed. Our study also demonstrated that machine learning algorithms can be trained on a synthetic library to improve the estimation of several root system traits. Overall, our analysis is a call to caution when using automatic root image analysis tools. If a thorough calibration is not performed on the dataset of interest, unexpected errors might arise, especially for large and complex root images. To facilitate such calibration, both the image library and the different codes used in the study have been made available to the community.

Citing Articles

Automated seminal root angle measurement with corrective annotation.

Smith A, Malinowska M, Ruud A, Janss L, Krusell L, Jensen J AoB Plants. 2024; 16(5):plae046.

PMID: 39465185 PMC: 11512109. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plae046.


Macroalgal-derived alginate/wastepaper hydrogel to alleviate sunflower drought stress.

Gomaa M, Aldaby E Planta. 2023; 257(6):112.

PMID: 37162583 PMC: 10172250. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-023-04152-w.


Machine learning versus crop growth models: an ally, not a rival.

Zhang N, Zhou X, Kang M, Hu B, Heuvelink E, Marcelis L AoB Plants. 2023; 15(2):plac061.

PMID: 36751366 PMC: 9893870. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plac061.


Resources for image-based high-throughput phenotyping in crops and data sharing challenges.

Danilevicz M, Bayer P, Nestor B, Bennamoun M, Edwards D Plant Physiol. 2021; 187(2):699-715.

PMID: 34608963 PMC: 8561249. DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab301.


A Comparative Analysis of Quantitative Metrics of Root Architecture.

Rangarajan H, Lynch J Plant Phenomics. 2021; 2021:6953197.

PMID: 33851135 PMC: 8028844. DOI: 10.34133/2021/6953197.


References
1.
Rellan-Alvarez R, Lobet G, Lindner H, Pradier P, Sebastian J, Yee M . GLO-Roots: an imaging platform enabling multidimensional characterization of soil-grown root systems. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4589753. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.07597. View

2.
Galkovskyi T, Mileyko Y, Bucksch A, Moore B, Symonova O, Price C . GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12:116. PMC: 3444351. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-116. View

3.
Lobet G, Pound M, Diener J, Pradal C, Draye X, Godin C . Root system markup language: toward a unified root architecture description language. Plant Physiol. 2015; 167(3):617-27. PMC: 4348768. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.253625. View

4.
Bucksch A, Burridge J, York L, Das A, Nord E, Weitz J . Image-based high-throughput field phenotyping of crop roots. Plant Physiol. 2014; 166(2):470-86. PMC: 4213080. DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.243519. View

5.
Koevoets I, Venema J, Elzenga J, Testerink C . Roots Withstanding their Environment: Exploiting Root System Architecture Responses to Abiotic Stress to Improve Crop Tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:1335. PMC: 5005332. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01335. View