» Articles » PMID: 28418869

Development of a Taiwan Cancer-related Fatigue Cognition Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity

Overview
Journal Oncotarget
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Apr 19
PMID 28418869
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We prospectively designed a Taiwan cancer-related fatigue cognition questionnaire, version 1.0 (TCRFCQ-V1.0), for Taiwanese patients with cancer and investigated the reliability and validity of this questionnaire.

Results: The completion rate of the TCRFCQ-V1.0 was high (97% of the patients completed all items), and the rate of missing data was low (0.2%-1.1% for each item). Moreover, the Cronbach alpha value was 0.889. We eliminated 5 items because their respective Cronbach alpha values were higher than the total mean value of Cronbach's alpha. Overall, the TCRFCQ-V1.0 had adequate Cronbach alpha coefficients (range, from 0.882 to 0.889). In addition, the results of Bartlett's test were significant (chi-squared, 2390.11; p < 0.001), indicating the appropriateness of factor analysis. Sampling adequacy was confirmed by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin statistic of 0.868. Through exploratory factor analysis, we identified 6 factors with eigenvalues of > 1, and the scree plot indicated no flattening factors. Overall, 28 items achieved a factor loading of ≥ 0.55.

Materials And Methods: We enrolled patients with cancer who were aged > 18 years, had received a pathological diagnosis of cancer, and had undergone cancer treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiotherapy at a single institute in Taiwan. Of the identified 167 eligible patients, 161 (96.4%) were approached. Of these patients, 6 (7.2%) declined to participate and 155 (92.8%) were interviewed. The initial 43 items in the TCRFCQ-V1.0 were assessed for ceiling and floor effects.

Conclusions: The TCRFCQ-V1.0 is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring CRF cognition in Taiwanese patients with cancer.

Citing Articles

Screening and Assessment of Cancer-Related Fatigue: A Clinical Practice Guideline for Health Care Providers.

Fisher M, Cohn J, Harrington S, Lee J, Malone D Phys Ther. 2022; 102(9).

PMID: 36179114 PMC: 9525018. DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac120.


Current Societal Views about Sustainable Wildlife Management and Conservation: A Survey of College Students in China.

Miao Z, Wang Q, Chen D, Song Z, Zhang W, Zhou X Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10).

PMID: 33036300 PMC: 7599632. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101821.


Physical training interventions for children and teenagers affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia and related treatment impairments.

Simioni C, Zauli G, Martelli A, Vitale M, Ultimo S, Milani D Oncotarget. 2018; 9(24):17199-17209.

PMID: 29682216 PMC: 5908317. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24762.

References
1.
Minton O, Stone P . A systematic review of the scales used for the measurement of cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Ann Oncol. 2008; 20(1):17-25. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn537. View

2.
Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver T, Hack T, Broadfield L, Biggs K . A pan-Canadian practice guideline and algorithm: screening, assessment, and supportive care of adults with cancer-related fatigue. Curr Oncol. 2013; 20(3):e233-46. PMC: 3671030. DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1302. View

3.
Bower J, Bak K, Berger A, Breitbart W, Escalante C, Ganz P . Screening, assessment, and management of fatigue in adult survivors of cancer: an American Society of Clinical oncology clinical practice guideline adaptation. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32(17):1840-50. PMC: 4039870. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.4495. View

4.
Mitchell S, Beck S, Hood L, Moore K, Tanner E . Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for fatigue during and following cancer and its treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007; 11(1):99-113. DOI: 10.1188/07.CJON.99-113. View

5.
Cella D, Davis K, Breitbart W, Curt G . Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19(14):3385-91. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.14.3385. View