Migration Distance As a Selective Episode for Wing Morphology in a Migratory Insect
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Selective pressures that occur during long-distance migration can influence morphological traits across a range of taxa. In flying insects, selection should favour individuals that have wing morphologies that increase energy efficiency and survival. In monarch butterflies, differences in wing morphology between migratory and resident populations suggest that migratory populations have undergone selection for larger (as measured by length and area) and more elongated (as measured by roundness and aspect ratio) forewings. However, selection on wing morphology may also occur within migratory populations, particularly if individuals or populations consistently migrate different distances.
Results: Using 613 monarch butterflies that were collected on the Mexican wintering grounds between 1976 - 2014, we tested whether monarch wing traits were associated with migratory distance from their natal areas in eastern North America (migration range: 774-4430 km), as inferred by stable-hydrogen (H) and -carbon (C) isotopic measurements. Monarchs that migrated farther distances to reach their overwintering sites tended to have longer and larger wings, suggesting positive selective pressure during migration on wing length and area. There was no relationship between migration distances and either roundness or aspect ratio.
Conclusions: Our results provide correlative evidence that the migratory period may act as a selective episode on monarch butterfly wing morphology, although selection during other portions of the annual cycle, as well as extensive mixing of individuals from various natal locations on the breeding grounds, likely counteracts directional selection of migration on morphology.
Hobson K, Ramirez M, Mora Alvarez B, Kusack J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):7111.
PMID: 40016263 PMC: 11868386. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79624-4.
Multiple factors contribute to female dominance in migratory bioflows.
Doyle T, Poole O, Barnes J, Hawkes W, Jimenez Guri E, Wotton K Open Biol. 2025; 15(2):240235.
PMID: 39933573 PMC: 11813574. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.240235.
Reich M, Shipilina D, Talla V, Bahleman F, Kebe K, Berger J PNAS Nexus. 2025; 4(2):pgae586.
PMID: 39906311 PMC: 11792081. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae586.
Kc S, Sapkota A Ecol Evol. 2024; 14(12):e70612.
PMID: 39691430 PMC: 11650754. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70612.
Wind energy and insects: reviewing the state of knowledge and identifying potential interactions.
Weschler M, Tronstad L PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18153.
PMID: 39421426 PMC: 11485068. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18153.