» Articles » PMID: 28416002

Biological Effects of Exposure to Static Electric Fields in Humans and Vertebrates: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Environ Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Apr 19
PMID 28416002
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High-voltage direct current (HVDC) lines are the technology of choice for the transport of large amounts of energy over long distances. The operation of these lines produces static electric fields (EF), but the data reviewed in previous assessments were not sufficient to assess the need for any environmental limit. The aim of this systematic review was to update the current state of research and to evaluate biological effects of static EF.

Methods: Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations, we collected and evaluated experimental and epidemiological studies examining biological effects of exposure to static EF in humans (n = 8) and vertebrates (n = 40).

Results: There is good evidence that humans and animals are able to perceive the presence of static EF at sufficiently high levels. Hair movements caused by electrostatic forces may play a major role in this perception. A large number of studies reported responses of animals (e.g., altered metabolic, immunologic or developmental parameters) to a broad range of static EF strengths as well, but these responses are likely secondary physiological responses to sensory stimulation. Furthermore, the quality of many of the studies reporting physiological responses is poor, which raises concerns about confounding.

Conclusion: The weight of the evidence from the literature reviewed did not indicate that static EF have adverse biological effects in humans or animals. The evidence strongly supported the role of superficial sensory stimulation of hair and skin as the basis for perception of the field, as well as reported indirect behavioral and physiological responses. Physical considerations also preclude any direct effect of static EF on internal physiology, and reports that some physiological processes are affected in minor ways may be explained by other factors. While this literature does not support a level of concern about biological effects of exposure to static EF, the conditions that affect thresholds for human detection and possible annoyance at suprathreshold levels should be investigated.

Citing Articles

Effects of non-contact electric fields on the kidneys and livers of tumour-bearing rats.

Alamsyah F, Firdausi N, Nugraheni S, Fadhlurrahman A, Nurhidayat L, Pratiwi R F1000Res. 2025; 12:117.

PMID: 39931163 PMC: 11809679. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.110080.3.


Directionally non-rotating electric field therapy delivered through implanted electrodes as a glioblastoma treatment platform: A proof-of-principle study.

Ma J, Singh S, Li M, Seelig D, Molnar G, Wong E Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae121.

PMID: 39156619 PMC: 11327618. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae121.


Using electric fields to control insects: current applications and future directions.

Jobe N, Chourasia A, Smith B, Molins E, Rose A, Pavlic T J Insect Sci. 2024; 24(1).

PMID: 38340047 PMC: 10858648. DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/ieae007.


Whole-Body Electrostatic Pain Treatment in Adults with Chronic Pain: A Prospective Multicentric Observational Clinical Trial.

Steinhauser S, Ganter M, Stadelmann V, Hofer C Pain Ther. 2023; 13(1):69-85.

PMID: 38015366 PMC: 10796901. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00560-8.


Systematic review of the physiological and health-related effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure from wireless communication devices on children and adolescents in experimental and epidemiological human studies.

Bodewein L, Dechent D, Graefrath D, Kraus T, Krause T, Driessen S PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0268641.

PMID: 35648738 PMC: 9159629. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268641.


References
1.
. Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2002; 80:1-395. PMC: 5098132. View

2.
Guler G, Atalay N . Changes in hydroxyproline levels in electric field tissue interaction. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 1996; 33(6):531-3. View

3.
Charry J, Bailey W . Regional turnover of norepinephrine and dopamine in rat brain following acute exposure to air ions. Bioelectromagnetics. 1985; 6(4):415-25. DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250060408. View

4.
Fam W . Prolonged exposure of mice to 350 kV/m electrostatic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981; 28(6):453-9. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.1981.324818. View

5.
Kaune W . Power-frequency electric fields averaged over the body surfaces of grounded humans and animals. Bioelectromagnetics. 1981; 2(4):403-6. DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250020411. View