» Articles » PMID: 28414822

2-dimensional Shear Wave Elastography: Interobserver Agreement and Factors Related to Interobserver Discrepancy

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2017 Apr 18
PMID 28414822
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) in measuring liver stiffness (LS) and to investigate factors related to liver 2D-SWE.

Materials And Methods: A prospective study was conducted between August 2011 and August 2012 in rheumatoid arthritis patients who had been treated with methotrexate. Interobserver reproducibility of 2D-SWE was evaluated, and the relationship between interobserver difference in LS and related factors was analyzed using linear regression analyses. We considered age, sex, alanine transaminase, cholesterol, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference as clinical factors, and the mean value of standard deviation (SDM), its difference between two examiners, mean diameter of the regions of interest (ROIM), and its difference in the elasticity map as investigation factors. The cut-off value for significant factors to predict interobserver discrepancies in LS-based fibrosis stage was also inspected.

Results: In total, 176 patients were enrolled. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the two examiners was 0.784. In the univariate analysis, SDM and ROIM were independently associated with interobserver differences in LS as well as BMI, waist circumference, and the difference of ROI, but SDM and ROIM were the only ones significantly related in multivariate analysis (p<0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively). The best cut-off value for SDM in predicting interobserver discrepancy in LS-based fibrosis stage was 1.4.

Conclusions: Interobserver reproducibility of 2D-SWE for measuring LS was good and SDM was the most significantly associated factor with interobserver differences in LS and interobserver discordance in LS-based fibrosis stage.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Performance of 2D Shear Wave (2D-SWE) for Liver Fibrosis in Adults Undergoing Bariatric Surgery.

Alcantara-Diaz A, Ruiz-Fernandez J, Salazar-Alarcon J, Salinas-Sedo G, Toro-Huamanchumo C Obes Surg. 2023; 33(10):3120-3126.

PMID: 37566340 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06766-1.


2D-shear wave elastography: number of acquisitions can be reduced according to clinical setting.

Dioguardi Burgio M, Gregory J, Ronot M, Sartoris R, Chatellier G, Vilgrain V Insights Imaging. 2021; 12(1):145.

PMID: 34674032 PMC: 8531167. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01090-7.


Diagnostic problems in two-dimensional shear wave elastography of the liver.

Naganuma H, Ishida H, Uno A, Nagai H, Kuroda H, Ogawa M World J Radiol. 2020; 12(5):76-86.

PMID: 32549956 PMC: 7288776. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v12.i5.76.


Ultrasonographic and elastographic biometry in adult major salivary glands: a preliminary case-control report.

Fang K, Wen M, Hsu W, Chang C, Hou P, Liao L Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):8885.

PMID: 31222096 PMC: 6586938. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-45230-y.


Technical Performance of Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography for Measuring Liver Stiffness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kim D, Suh C, Kim K, Pyo J, Park C, Jung S Korean J Radiol. 2019; 20(6):880-893.

PMID: 31132814 PMC: 6536798. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0812.


References
1.
Hudson J, Milot L, Parry C, Williams R, Burns P . Inter- and intra-operator reliability and repeatability of shear wave elastography in the liver: a study in healthy volunteers. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013; 39(6):950-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.12.011. View

2.
Jung K, Kim S . Clinical applications of transient elastography. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2012; 18(2):163-73. PMC: 3415879. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2012.18.2.163. View

3.
Choi S, Jeong W, Kim Y, Lim S, Kwon J, Kim T . How many times should we repeat measuring liver stiffness using shear wave elastography?: 5-repetition versus 10-repetition protocols. Ultrasonics. 2016; 72:158-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.08.005. View

4.
Woo H, Lee J, Yoon J, Kim W, Cho B, Choi B . Comparison of the Reliability of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging and Supersonic Shear Imaging in Measurement of Liver Stiffness. Radiology. 2015; 277(3):881-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015141975. View

5.
Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I, Salzl P, Sirli R, Neghina A . Meta-analysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int. 2013; 33(8):1138-47. DOI: 10.1111/liv.12240. View