» Articles » PMID: 28411120

Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in Patients with Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism: a Propensity-matched Nationwide Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Lancet Haematol
Specialties Hematology
Oncology
Date 2017 Apr 16
PMID 28411120
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are collectively known as venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a common vascular disease and a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. We compare effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in a prospective cohort of routine care patients with incident unprovoked VTE.

Methods: In this propensity-matched cohort study, we linked nationwide Danish health registries to identify all patients with a first hospital diagnosis of unprovoked VTE who were new users of rivaroxaban or warfarin. Excluded patients included those who had not been residents in Denmark for at least 1 year before VTE diagnosis, patients with outpatient VTE diagnosis only, patients with other indications for oral anticoagulation treatment, patients with previous experience of oral anticoagulation, patients who did not have a prescription for rivaroxaban or warfarin within 7 days of VTE, and patients who redeemed prescriptions for both rivaroxaban and warfarin, or other oral anticoagulants. Primary effectiveness outcome was recurrent VTE and primary safety outcome was major bleeding. We used propensity matching and Cox regression to compare rates of the outcomes with rivaroxaban versus standard treatment.

Results: From Dec 9, 2011, to Feb 28, 2016, we identified 29 963 patients with incident VTE. After exclusion, we identified 1734 propensity-matched patients given rivaroxaban (1751 before propensity matching) and 2945 propensity-matched patients given warfarin. The rate of recurrent VTE at 6 months' follow-up was 9·9 incidents per 100 person-years with rivaroxaban versus 13·1 incidents per 100 person-years with warfarin, yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·74 (95% CI 0·56-0·96). The rate of major bleeding was 2·4 per 100 person-years at 6 months in rivaroxaban users versus 2·0 in warfarin users (HR 1·19, 95% CI 0·66-2·13).

Interpretation: In this clinical practice setting, rivaroxaban in patients with unprovoked VTE was associated with reduced risk of recurrent VTE compared with standard treatment, without compromising safety.

Funding: Obel Family Foundation.

Citing Articles

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism using Real-World Data: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alshahrani W, Alshahrani R, Alkathiri M, Alay S, Alabkka A, Alaraj S Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024; 24(6):823-839.

PMID: 39254826 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-024-00677-x.


Long-term survival in venous thromboembolic disease: rivaroxaban vs. warfarin - propensity score matching study.

Ramos-Isaza E, Tuta-Quintero E, Bastidas-Goyes A, Diaz-Quijano D, Aponte-Murcia C, Espitia-Angel J BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023; 24(1):77.

PMID: 38093310 PMC: 10720047. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-023-00712-8.


Trends in the Use of Oral Anticoagulants for Adults With Venous Thromboembolism in the US, 2010-2020.

Iyer G, Tesfaye H, Khan N, Zakoul H, Bykov K JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(3):e234059.

PMID: 36947039 PMC: 10034573. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4059.


Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants: a nationwide propensity score-weighted study.

Ingason A, Hreinsson J, Agustsson A, Lund S, Rumba E, Palsson D Blood Adv. 2022; 7(11):2564-2572.

PMID: 36562754 PMC: 10242633. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009099.


Sequential Therapy of Nadroparin and Rivaroxaban in the Initial Treatment of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism.

Xiong W, Zhao Y, Liu S, Du H, Wang Y, Li W Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:810455.

PMID: 35401221 PMC: 8988054. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.810455.