» Articles » PMID: 28408018

Early Invasive Versus Selective Strategy For Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The ICTUS Trial

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 15
PMID 28408018
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The ICTUS (Invasive Versus Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes) trial compared early invasive strategy with a selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and an elevated cardiac troponin T. No long-term benefit of an early invasive strategy was found at 1 and 5 years.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the 10-year clinical outcomes of an early invasive strategy versus a selective invasive strategy in patients with NSTE-ACS and an elevated cardiac troponin T.

Methods: The ICTUS trial was a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial that included 1,200 patients with NSTE-ACS and an elevated cardiac troponin T. Enrollment was from July 2001 to August 2003. We collected 10-year follow-up of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization through the Dutch population registry, patient phone calls, general practitioners, and hospital records. The primary outcome was the 10-year composite of death or spontaneous MI. Additional outcomes included the composite of death or MI, death, MI (spontaneous and procedure-related), and revascularization.

Results: Ten-year death or spontaneous MI was not statistically different between the 2 groups (33.8% vs. 29.0%, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.46; p = 0.11). Revascularization occurred in 82.6% of the early invasive group and 60.5% in the selective invasive group. There were no differences in additional outcomes, except for a higher rate of death or MI in the early invasive group compared with the rates for the selective invasive group (37.6% vs. 30.5%; HR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.58; p = 0.009), driven by a higher rate of procedure-related MI in the early invasive group (6.5% vs. 2.4%; HR: 2.82; 95% CI: 1.53 to 5.20; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: In patients with NSTE-ACS and elevated cardiac troponin T levels, an early invasive strategy has no benefit over a selective invasive strategy in reducing the 10-year composite outcome of death or spontaneous MI, and a selective invasive strategy may be a viable option in selected patients.

Citing Articles

Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.

Abukhalil A, Hamad S, Swaileh Z, Ghanem A, Abumadi S, Madia R Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1173-1181.

PMID: 38882643 PMC: 11180461. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S467924.


Comprehensive evaluation of time-varied outcomes for invasive and conservative strategies in patients with NSTE-ACS: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhao Y, Sun Y, Wang F, Cai Y, Alolga R, Qi L Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1197451.

PMID: 37745128 PMC: 10516546. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1197451.


Invasive versus Conservative Management in Coronary Artery Disease.

Rezkalla S, Kloner R Clin Med Res. 2023; 21(2):95-104.

PMID: 37407216 PMC: 10321727. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2023.1806.


Clinical and Angiographic Profile in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and Chronic Stable Angina: A Tertiary Care Centre-Based Cohort Study From Southern Indian Population.

Raju V Cureus. 2023; 15(5):e38369.

PMID: 37265924 PMC: 10230317. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38369.


Effect of delayed hospitalization on 3-year clinical outcomes according to renal function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Kim Y, Her A, Rha S, Choi C, Choi B, Kim J Cardiol J. 2023; 31(2):271-284.

PMID: 37246457 PMC: 11076037. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2023.0036.