» Articles » PMID: 28407465

KRAS G12C Mutation As a Poor Prognostic Marker of Pemetrexed Treatment in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2017 Apr 14
PMID 28407465
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aims: The predictive and prognostic value of KRAS mutation and its type of mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are controversial. This clinical study was designed to investigate the predictive value of KRAS mutations and its mutation types to pemetrexed and gemcitabine based treatment.

Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients tested for KRAS mutation (n = 334) were retrospectively reviewed and 252 patients with wild type epidermal growth factor receptor and no anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion were enrolled for the analysis. KRAS mutations were observed in 45 subjects with mutation type as followed: G12C (n = 13), G12D (n = 12), G12V (n = 12), other (n = 8). Response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of pemetrexed singlet and gemcitabine based chemotherapy were analysis.

Results: Age, sex, performance status were well balanced between subjects with or without KRAS mutations. No difference was observed in RR. Hazard ratio (HR) of PFS for pemetrexed treated subjects with G12C mutation compared to subjects with KRAS wild type was 1.96 (95% confidential interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.79; = 0.045), but other mutations failed to show clinical significance. By analysis done by PFS, compared to the subjects with transition mutation, HR was 1.48 (95% CI, 0.64 to 3.40; = 0.360) for subjects with transversion mutation on pemetrexed treatment and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.87; = 0.020) for subjects treated with gemcitabine based chemotherapy. No difference was observed in OS.

Conclusions: In this study, different drug sensitivity was observed according to the type of KRAS mutation. NSCLC subpopulations with different KRAS mutation type should be considered as different subgroups and optimal chemotherapy regimens should be searched in further confirmative studies.

Citing Articles

MYC and KRAS cooperation: from historical challenges to therapeutic opportunities in cancer.

Casacuberta-Serra S, Gonzalez-Larreategui I, Capitan-Leo D, Soucek L Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):205.

PMID: 39164274 PMC: 11336233. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-01907-z.


KRAS as a Prognostic and Predictive Marker in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Fatima S, Pansuriya N, Lakhani A, Madhuri S, Ajmal R, Clementina R Cureus. 2024; 16(5):e60061.

PMID: 38860089 PMC: 11162968. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60061.


A Critical Review of the Prognostic and Predictive Implications of and Mutations and Co-Mutations in Metastatic Non-Small Lung Cancer.

Manolakos P, Ward L J Pers Med. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37373999 PMC: 10304809. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13061010.


Light at the end of the tunnel: Clinical features and therapeutic prospects of KRAS mutant subtypes in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Gao L, Shen W Front Genet. 2022; 13:890247.

PMID: 36338994 PMC: 9634530. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.890247.


Molecular Biology and Therapeutic Perspectives for K-Ras Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers.

Cekani E, Epistolio S, Dazio G, Cefali M, Wannesson L, Frattini M Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36077640 PMC: 9454753. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174103.


References
1.
Solomon B, Mok T, Kim D, Wu Y, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T . First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(23):2167-77. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440. View

2.
Moran D, Trusk P, Pry K, Paz K, Sidransky D, Bacus S . KRAS mutation status is associated with enhanced dependency on folate metabolism pathways in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014; 13(6):1611-24. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0649. View

3.
Schubbert S, Shannon K, Bollag G . Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007; 7(4):295-308. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2109. View

4.
DAngelo S, Janjigian Y, Ahye N, Riely G, Chaft J, Sima C . Distinct clinical course of EGFR-mutant resected lung cancers: results of testing of 1118 surgical specimens and effects of adjuvant gefitinib and erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol. 2012; 7(12):1815-1822. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826bb7b2. View

5.
Shankaran V, Obel J, Benson 3rd A . Predicting response to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: current practice and future directions. Oncologist. 2010; 15(2):157-67. PMC: 3227936. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0221. View