» Articles » PMID: 28405740

MRI is Not Reliable in Diagnosing of Concomitant Anterolateral Ligament and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2017 Apr 14
PMID 28405740
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: There has been a renewed interest in the anterolateral structures of the knee, including description of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) as a distinct structure. Recognizing injury to the ALL is challenging, particularly given the subjective nature of physical examination. Consequently, focus has turned to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to reach a preoperative diagnosis of this region. The aim of this study was to examine the ability of 3-Tesla (3T) MRI to identify the ALL in ACL-injured patients compared to a matched control group of ACL-intact patients. The hypothesis was that the ALL would be more difficult to identify in ACL-injured patients compared to ACL-intact patients.

Methods: A prospective case control study was performed comparing 3T MRI scans of 63-patients with an ACL rupture with a control group of 64-patients without ACL injury. An experienced musculoskeletal radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon evaluated the scans performed using standard knee protocols. The ALL was considered in three regions for analysis: femoral, meniscal, and tibial. The status of the ALL was determined as visualized or non-visualized, and the integrity was assessed as intact, attenuated, or focal discontinuity.

Results: The detection rate of at least a portion of the ALL was 41/64 (64%) in the control group and 45/63 (72%) in the ACL-injured cohort, respectively. The entire length of the ALL could only be identified in 15/64 (23%) of the control group and 13/63 (21%) of the ACL-injured cases. In both groups, the visibility of the ALL was poorest at the femoral region and greatest at the tibial regions. The ALL, when visualized, was deemed to be intact in 55/63 (87%) of cases. Although the inter-observer reliability was excellent for detection of the ALL in the control group (κ = 0.86), this decreased to only moderate reliability in the ACL-injured group (κ = 0.52).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that MRI alone should not be relied upon to make a diagnosis of ALL injury in the setting of concomitant ACL injury due to the inability to accurately visualize this structure consistently in its entirety. To make a diagnosis of ALL injury or anterolateral instability of the knee and clinical correlation remains essential.

Level Of Evidence: Case-control study, Level III.

Citing Articles

First in-vivo magic angle directional imaging using dedicated low-field MRI.

Ristic M, Chappell K, Lanz H, McGinley J, Gupte C, Amiras D Magn Reson Med. 2024; 93(3):1077-1089.

PMID: 39428680 PMC: 11680723. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30332.


Does an early post traumatic knee brace reduce the incidence of knee rotational instability?.

Murgier J, Duthon V, Deygas A, Ehkirch F Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(3):1161-1169.

PMID: 38253710 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05206-8.


The Association Between Bone Bruises and Concomitant Ligaments Injuries in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Yi Z, Jiang J, Liu Z, Wang H, Yi Q, Zhan H Indian J Orthop. 2023; 57(1):20-32.

PMID: 36660483 PMC: 9789248. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00774-6.


The anterior cruciate ligament injury severity scale (ACLISS) is an effective tool to document and categorize the magnitude of associated tissue damage in knees after primary ACL injury and reconstruction.

Seil R, Pioger C, Siboni R, Amendola A, Mouton C Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(7):2983-2997.

PMID: 36629888 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07311-4.


Anterolateral ligament reconstruction in addition to primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for grade 3 pivot shift improves residual knee instability during surgery.

Kawanishi Y, Kobayashi M, Yasuma S, Fukushima H, Kato J, Murase A J Exp Orthop. 2021; 8(1):51.

PMID: 34278532 PMC: 8286908. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-021-00369-4.


References
1.
Atkinson P, Cooper T, Anseth S, Walter N, Kargus R, Haut R . Association of knee bone bruise frequency with time postinjury and type of soft tissue injury. Orthopedics. 2009; 31(5):440. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080501-01. View

2.
Stijak L, Bumbasirevic M, Radonjic V, Kadija M, Puskas L, Milovanovic D . Anatomic description of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 24(7):2083-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3422-6. View

3.
Porrino Jr J, Maloney E, Richardson M, Mulcahy H, Ha A, Chew F . The anterolateral ligament of the knee: MRI appearance, association with the Segond fracture, and historical perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204(2):367-73. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.12693. View

4.
Caterine S, Litchfield R, Johnson M, Chronik B, Getgood A . A cadaveric study of the anterolateral ligament: re-introducing the lateral capsular ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(11):3186-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3117-z. View

5.
Taneja A, Miranda F, Braga C, Gill C, Hartmann L, Santos D . MRI features of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2014; 44(3):403-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-014-2052-x. View