» Articles » PMID: 28405457

Factors for Improving Reproductive Performance of Sows and Herd Productivity in Commercial Breeding Herds

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Apr 14
PMID 28405457
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We review critical factors associated with reproductive performance of female breeding pigs, their lifetime performance and herd productivity in commercial herds. The factors include both sow-level and herd-level factors. High risk sow-level groups for decreasing reproductive performance of female pigs are low or high parity, increased outdoor temperature, decreased lactation feed intake, single inseminations, increased lactation length, prolonged weaning-to-first-mating interval, low birth weight or low preweaning growth rate, a few pigs born alive at parity 1, an increased number of stillborn piglets, foster-in or nurse sow practices and low or high age at first-mating. Also, returned female pigs are at risk having a recurrence of returning to estrus, and female pigs around farrowing are more at risk of dying. Herd-level risk groups include female pigs being fed in low efficiency breeding herds, late insemination timing, high within-herd variability in pig flow, limited numbers of farrowing spaces and fluctuating age structure. To maximize the reproductive potential of female pigs, producers are recommended to closely monitor females in these high-risk groups and improve herd management. Additionally, herd management and performance measurements in high-performing herds should be targeted.

Citing Articles

Effects of Dietary Multi-Carbohydrase and Phytase Complex Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility, Bone Mineralization and Puberty Onset in Gilts.

Chen F, Zhou R, Zhao L, Huang L, Zhuo Y, Xu S Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(4).

PMID: 40002944 PMC: 11851570. DOI: 10.3390/ani15040462.


Deep Learning-Enhanced Diagnosis of Sow Pregnancy Through Low-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging.

Kim T, Choi Y, Hong J, Park H, Kim Y, Kim J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943088 PMC: 11815955. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030318.


Utero-placental adaptations in response to intrauterine growth restriction in swine.

Clemens M, Tyree M, Stenhouse C Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2025; 91:106917.

PMID: 39862557 PMC: 11850212. DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2025.106917.


Identifying Significant SNPs of the Total Number of Piglets Born and Their Relationship with Leg Bumps in Pigs.

Bakoev S, Getmantseva L, Kolosova M, Bakoev F, Kolosov A, Romanets E Biology (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765701 PMC: 11673605. DOI: 10.3390/biology13121034.


The sow vaginal and gut microbiota associated with longevity and reproductive performance.

Liu Z, Tsai T, Zuo B, Howe S, Farrar J, Randolph C J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2025; 16(1):6.

PMID: 39762999 PMC: 11705881. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01140-2.


References
1.
Vinsky M, Novak S, Dixon W, Dyck M, Foxcroft G . Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006; 18(3):347-55. DOI: 10.1071/rd05142. View

2.
Sasaki Y, Koketsu Y . A herd management survey on culling guidelines and actual culling practices in three herd groups based on reproductive productivity in Japanese commercial swine herds. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(6):1995-2002. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4313. View

3.
Bruun T, Amdi C, Vinther J, Schop M, Strathe A, Hansen C . Reproductive performance of "nurse sows" in Danish piggeries. Theriogenology. 2016; 86(4):981-987. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.03.023. View

4.
Tani S, Pineiro C, Koketsu Y . Recurrence patterns and factors associated with regular, irregular, and late return to service of female pigs and their lifetime performance on southern European farms. J Anim Sci. 2016; 94(5):1924-32. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016-0302. View

5.
Bertoldo M, Holyoake P, Evans G, Grupen C . Seasonal variation in the ovarian function of sows. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2012; 24(6):822-34. DOI: 10.1071/RD11249. View