» Articles » PMID: 28403414

A National Survey of Videolaryngoscopy in the United Kingdom

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2017 Apr 14
PMID 28403414
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background.: There are increasing numbers of videolaryngoscopes marketed and increasing interest in the technology. The Difficult Airway Society's 2015 guidelines recommend that videolaryngoscopes should be immediately available at all times and that all anaesthetists should be trained and skilled in their use.

Methods.: An electronic survey was sent to all UK National Health Service hospitals to examine availability, use, and attitudes to videolaryngoscopy, and closed in January 2014.

Results.: The return rate was 67%. Videolaryngoscopy was available in 91% of operating theatres, ∼50% of intensive care units (ICUs) and obstetric theatres, with lower availability in emergency departments (EDs), paediatric anaesthesia, and independent sector hospitals. The most widely available devices were the Airtraq, the GlideScope, and C-MAC. Approximately one in seven respondents reported availability of videolaryngoscopy in all clinical areas. Most departments imposed restrictions on videolaryngoscopy use, especially the ICU and ED. Device selection was only infrequently based on published literature or formal trial. Structured introduction of videolaryngoscopy into practice was uncommon. Penetration of videolaryngoscopy was highly variable; fewer than a third reported widespread use or enthusiasm, although this increased where the C-MAC and GlideScope were widely available.

Conclusions.: Videolaryngoscopy is available in most hospitals' main operating departments, but in fewer than half of other locations. There is marked variation in device, methods of introduction, usage, and clinical adoption. Most hospitals need to change practice to comply with current guidelines. Selection and implementation vary widely.

Citing Articles

Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for optimizing video laryngoscopy-assisted tracheal intubation: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Creutzburg A, Norskov A, Christensen M, Afshari A, Lundstrom L, Bill L Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025; 69(3):e70008.

PMID: 39979231 PMC: 11842299. DOI: 10.1111/aas.70008.


Evaluating the Impact of Direct, Direct Video, and Indirect Video Laryngoscopy Training on the Proficiency of Medical Students in Performing Direct Laryngoscopy: A High-Fidelity Manikin-Based Assessment.

Moriarty S, Perera I, Sabbagh M, Yeckley M, Carpio P, Hoodfar A Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70984.

PMID: 39507137 PMC: 11540125. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70984.


Comparison of AirAngel® vs. Storz® videolaryngoscope and Macintosh® laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation training: prospective randomized crossover study.

Merter S, Kayayurt K, Kitapcioglu D, Yaylaci S BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):933.

PMID: 39192254 PMC: 11351083. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05388-0.


National survey on the current status of airway management in China.

He Y, Zhang Z, Li R, Hu D, Gao H, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15627.

PMID: 38972909 PMC: 11228041. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66526-8.


EARLY TEACHING AND ADOPTION OF VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPY IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE TRAINING.

Delalic D, Prkacin I Acta Clin Croat. 2024; 62(Suppl1):99-104.

PMID: 38746601 PMC: 11090241. DOI: 10.20471/acc.2023.62.s1.12.