» Articles » PMID: 28402486

The Iterative Nature of Person Construal: Evidence from Event-related Potentials

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 13
PMID 28402486
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, a dynamic-interactive model of person construal (DI model) has been proposed, whereby the social categories a person represents are determined on the basis of an iterative integration of bottom-up and top-down influences. The current study sought to test this model by leveraging the high temporal resolution of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) as 65 participants viewed male faces that varied by race (White vs Black), fixating either between the eyes or on the forehead. Within face presentations, the effect of fixation, meant to vary bottom-up visual input, initially was large but decreased across early latency neural responses identified by a principal components analysis (PCA). In contrast, the effect of race, reflecting a combination of top-down and bottom-up factors, initially was small but increased across early latency principal components. These patterns support the DI model prediction that bottom-up and top-down processes are iteratively integrated to arrive at a stable construal within 230 ms. Additionally, exploratory multilevel modeling of single trial ERP responses representing a component linked to outgroup categorization (the P2) suggests change in effects of the manipulations over the course of the experiment. Implications of the findings for the DI model are considered.

Citing Articles

Acute sensitization of the P3 event-related potential response to beverage images and the risk for alcohol use disorder.

Cofresi R, Piasecki T, Bartholow B Addict Neurosci. 2022; 4.

PMID: 36425356 PMC: 9681121. DOI: 10.1016/j.addicn.2022.100041.


The role of task demands in racial face encoding.

Yang B, Ma J, Ding R, Xia X, Ding X Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):18896.

PMID: 36344573 PMC: 9640591. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19880-4.


Modeling temporal dynamics of face processing in youth and adults.

Hudac C, Naples A, DesChamps T, Coffman M, Kresse A, Ward T Soc Neurosci. 2021; 16(4):345-361.

PMID: 33882266 PMC: 8324546. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2021.1920050.


A Functional Coupling of Brain and Behavior During Social Categorization of Faces.

Volpert-Esmond H, Bartholow B Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021; 47(11):1580-1595.

PMID: 33419384 PMC: 8263806. DOI: 10.1177/0146167220976688.


Explicit Categorization Goals Affect Attention-Related Processing of Race and Gender During Person Construal.

Volpert-Esmond H, Bartholow B J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020; 85.

PMID: 32831396 PMC: 7442203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103839.


References
1.
Krosch A, Amodio D . Economic scarcity alters the perception of race. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(25):9079-84. PMC: 4078865. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404448111. View

2.
Freeman J, Ambady N . A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychol Rev. 2011; 118(2):247-79. DOI: 10.1037/a0022327. View

3.
Hayward W, Rhodes G, Schwaninger A . An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition. 2007; 106(2):1017-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.002. View

4.
Poldrack R . Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 10(2):59-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.004. View

5.
Zhao L, Bentin S . The role of features and configural processing in face-race classification. Vision Res. 2011; 51(23-24):2462-70. PMC: 3225710. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.10.001. View