» Articles » PMID: 28402480

Cognitive Benefit and Cost of Acute Stress is Differentially Modulated by Individual Brain State

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 13
PMID 28402480
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Acute stress is associated with beneficial as well as detrimental effects on cognition in different individuals. However, it is not yet known how stress can have such opposing effects. Stroop-like tasks typically show this dissociation: stress diminishes speed, but improves accuracy. We investigated accuracy and speed during a stroop-like task of 120 healthy male subjects after an experimental stress induction or control condition in a randomized, counter-balanced cross-over design; we assessed brain-behavior associations and determined the influence of individual brain connectivity patterns on these associations, which may moderate the effect and help identify stress resilience factors. In the mean, stress was associated to increase in accuracy, but decrease in speed. Accuracy was associated to brain activation in a distributed set of brain regions overlapping with the executive control network (ECN) and speed to temporo-parietal activation. In line with a stress-related large-scale network reconfiguration, individuals showing an upregulation of the salience and down-regulation of the executive-control network under stress displayed increased speed, but decreased performance. In contrast, individuals who upregulate their ECN under stress show improved performance. Our results indicate that the individual large-scale brain network balance under acute stress moderates cognitive consequences of threat.

Citing Articles

Revisiting Cognitive Deficits in Outpatients with Psychotic Disorders: A Transdiagnostic Comparison of Cognitive Performance While Accounting for Putative Confounding Factors.

Kammerer M, Nowak U, Lincoln T, Krkovic K Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790425 PMC: 11119287. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050446.


Functional MRI Techniques Suggesting that the Stress System Interacts with Three Large Scale Core Brain Networks to Help Coordinate the Adaptive Response: A Systematic Review.

Paltoglou G, Stefanaki C, Chrousos G Curr Neuropharmacol. 2023; 22(5):976-989.

PMID: 37533249 PMC: 10845086. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X21666230801151718.


The effect of perceived stress on cognition is mediated by personality and the underlying neural mechanism.

Zhu X, Yan W, Lin X, Que J, Huang Y, Zheng H Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):199.

PMID: 35550503 PMC: 9098451. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-01929-7.


Effects of a Multi-Suckling System Combined With Enriched Housing Post-Weaning on Response and Cognitive Resilience to Isolation.

Parois S, Van Der Zande L, Knol E, Kemp B, Rodenburg T, Bolhuis J Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:868149.

PMID: 35478601 PMC: 9035994. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.868149.


Inter-relationships between changes in stress, mindfulness, and dynamic functional connectivity in response to a social stressor.

Teng J, Massar S, Lim J Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):2396.

PMID: 35165343 PMC: 8844001. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06342-0.


References
1.
Lupien S, Maheu F, Tu M, Fiocco A, Schramek T . The effects of stress and stress hormones on human cognition: Implications for the field of brain and cognition. Brain Cogn. 2007; 65(3):209-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.02.007. View

2.
EASTERBROOK J . The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol Rev. 1959; 66(3):183-201. DOI: 10.1037/h0047707. View

3.
Etkin A, Egner T, Peraza D, Kandel E, Hirsch J . Resolving emotional conflict: a role for the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in modulating activity in the amygdala. Neuron. 2006; 51(6):871-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.029. View

4.
DiQuattro N, Geng J . Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(49):18026-35. PMC: 6634143. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4040-11.2011. View

5.
Vossel S, Geng J, Fink G . Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neuroscientist. 2013; 20(2):150-9. PMC: 4107817. DOI: 10.1177/1073858413494269. View