» Articles » PMID: 28398834

Dry Preservation of Spermatozoa: Considerations for Different Species

Overview
Publisher Mary Ann Liebert
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2017 Apr 12
PMID 28398834
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current gold standard for sperm preservation is storage at cryogenic temperatures. Dry preservation is an attractive alternative, eliminating the need for ultralow temperatures, reducing storage maintenance costs, and providing logistical flexibility for shipping. Many seeds and anhydrobiotic organisms are able to survive extended periods in a dry state through the accumulation of intracellular sugars and other osmolytes and are capable of returning to normal physiology postrehydration. Using techniques inspired by nature's adaptations, attempts have been made to dehydrate and dry preserve spermatozoa from a variety of species. Most of the anhydrous preservation research performed to date has focused on mouse spermatozoa, with only a small number of studies in nonrodent mammalian species. There is a significant difference between sperm function in rodent and nonrodent mammalian species with respect to centrosomal inheritance. Studies focused on reproductive technologies have demonstrated that in nonrodent species, the centrosome must be preserved to maintain sperm function as the spermatozoon centrosome contributes the dominant nucleating seed, consisting of the proximal centriole surrounded by pericentriolar components, onto which the oocyte's centrosomal material is assembled. Preservation techniques used for mouse sperm may therefore not necessarily be applicable to nonrodent spermatozoa. The range of technologies used to dehydrate sperm and the effect of processing and storage conditions on fertilization and embryogenesis using dried sperm are reviewed in the context of reproductive physiology and cellular morphology in different species.

Citing Articles

Long-term preservation of germ cells and gonadal tissues at ambient temperatures.

Comizzoli P, He X, Lee P Reprod Fertil. 2022; 3(2):R42-R50.

PMID: 35514540 PMC: 9066944. DOI: 10.1530/RAF-22-0008.


Update on techniques for cryopreservation of human spermatozoa.

Huang C, Tang Y, Hu J, Zhou W, Huang Z, Luo X Asian J Androl. 2022; 24(6):563-569.

PMID: 35381695 PMC: 9809481. DOI: 10.4103/aja20229.


Desiccated cat spermatozoa retain DNA integrity and developmental potential after prolonged storage and shipping at non-cryogenic temperatures.

Lee P, Zahmel J, Jewgenow K, Comizzoli P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 39(1):141-151.

PMID: 34609666 PMC: 8866589. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02337-4.


Drying and temperature induced conformational changes of nucleic acids and stallion sperm chromatin in trehalose preservation formulations.

Brogna R, Fan J, Sieme H, Wolkers W, Oldenhof H Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):14076.

PMID: 34234244 PMC: 8263733. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93569-y.


It takes two (centrioles) to tango.

Avidor-Reiss T, Fishman E Reproduction. 2018; 157(2):R33-R51.

PMID: 30496124 PMC: 6494718. DOI: 10.1530/REP-18-0350.


References
1.
Guo N, Puhlev I, Brown D, Mansbridge J, Levine F . Trehalose expression confers desiccation tolerance on human cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(2):168-71. DOI: 10.1038/72616. View

2.
Crowe J, Crowe L . Preservation of mammalian cells-learning nature's tricks. Nat Biotechnol. 2000; 18(2):145-6. DOI: 10.1038/72580. View

3.
Crowe J, Carpenter J, Crowe L . The role of vitrification in anhydrobiosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998; 60:73-103. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.60.1.73. View

4.
Kusakabe H, Yanagimachi R, Kamiguchi Y . Mouse and human spermatozoa can be freeze-dried without damaging their chromosomes. Hum Reprod. 2007; 23(2):233-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dem252. View

5.
Kwon I, Park K, Niwa K . Activation, pronuclear formation, and development in vitro of pig oocytes following intracytoplasmic injection of freeze-dried spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2004; 71(5):1430-6. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.031260. View