» Articles » PMID: 28396695

A New Patient Safety Smartphone Application for Prevention of "forgotten" Ureteral Stents: Results from a Clinical Pilot Study in 194 Patients

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2017 Apr 12
PMID 28396695
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Approximately 12% of all ureteral stents placed are retained or "forgotten." Forgotten stents are associated with significant safety concerns as well as increased costs and legal issues. Retained ureteral stents (RUS) often occur due to lack of clinical follow-up, communication or language barriers, and economic concerns.

Methods: We describe a multiplatform application that facilitates data collection to prevent RUS. The "Stent Tracker" application can be installed on mobile devices and computers. The encrypted and password-protected information is accessible from any device and provides information about each procedure, stent placement and removal dates, as well as product description. This multicenter retrospective study included 194 patients who underwent stent placement between July and October 2015. Nominal data was tallied and ordinal data was divided into quartiles of 25, 50, and 75%.

Results: A total of 194 patients from three institutions underwent ureteral stent placement. Reasons for stent placement include 122 cases post ureteroscopy (63%), 8 cases post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) (4%), 14 cases post extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) (7%), 18 cases of cancer-related ureteral obstruction (9%), 21 cases of hydronephrosis (11%), and 11 for other reasons (6%). Of these patients, only one patient was lost to follow-up (0.5%). On average, ureteral stents were removed within 14 days of placement (IQR: 8-26 days).

Conclusions: The "Stent Tracker" is a patient safety application that provides a secure and simplified interface, which can significantly reduce the incidence of RUS. Further developments could include automated notifications to patients and staff, color-coding, and integrated information with electronic patient charts.

Citing Articles

Ability and accuracy of the smartphone-based O`VIEW-M® sperm test: Useful tool in the era of Covid-19.

Kim K, Kim J, Roh J, Kim D, Kim H, Jo J PLoS One. 2022; 17(6):e0269894.

PMID: 35709172 PMC: 9202868. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269894.


Strategy to track double-J stents placed during COVID-19 using smartphone-based stent tracker application to prevent forgotten double-J stent in a high-volume centre: a smart solution.

Mulay A, Kapoor R, Sharma S, Asabe S, Belagali H, Singh S Afr J Urol. 2021; 27(1):110.

PMID: 34335017 PMC: 8314265. DOI: 10.1186/s12301-021-00212-3.


Are Technology-Driven Mobile Phone Applications (Apps) the New Currency for Digital Stent Registries and Patient Communication: Prospective Outcomes Using Urostentz App.

Hameed B, Shah M, Naik N, Amaresh M, Hegde P, Beary R Adv Urol. 2021; 2021:6612371.

PMID: 33505463 PMC: 7810523. DOI: 10.1155/2021/6612371.


Forgotten Double-J Ureteral Stent.

Lopes Neto A Int Braz J Urol. 2019; 45(6):1087-1089.

PMID: 31808394 PMC: 6909850. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.06.02.


It is efficient to monitor the status of implanted ureteral stent using a mobile social networking service application.

Wang Y, Xu M, Li W, Mao Y, Da J, Wang Z Urolithiasis. 2019; 48(1):79-84.

PMID: 30877315 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-019-01118-0.


References
1.
El-Faqih S, Shamsuddin A, Chakrabarti A, Atassi R, Kardar A, Osman M . Polyurethane internal ureteral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol. 1991; 146(6):1487-91. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38146-6. View

2.
Monga M . The dwell time of indwelling ureteral stents--the clock is ticking but when should we set the alarm?. J Urol. 2010; 185(2):387. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.017. View

3.
Sancaktutar A, Tepeler A, Soylemez H, Penbegul N, Atar M, Bozkurt Y . A solution for medical and legal problems arising from forgotten ureteral stents: initial results from a reminder short message service (SMS). Urol Res. 2011; 40(3):253-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-011-0404-8. View

4.
Singh V, Srinivastava A, Kapoor R, Kumar A . Can the complicated forgotten indwelling ureteric stents be lethal?. Int Urol Nephrol. 2005; 37(3):541-6. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-004-4704-6. View

5.
Ather M, Talati J, Biyabani R . Physician responsibility for removal of implants: the case for a computerized program for tracking overdue double-J stents. Tech Urol. 2000; 6(3):189-92. View