» Articles » PMID: 28396050

Value of the Cumulative Sum Test for the Assessment of a Learning Curve: Application to the Introduction of Patient-specific Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Academic Department

Overview
Journal Knee
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Apr 12
PMID 28396050
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of the study was to use the cumulative summation (CUSUM) test to assess the learning curve during the introduction of a new surgical technique (patient-specific instrumentation) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an academic department.

Methods: The first 50TKAs operated on at an academic department using patient-specific templates (PSTs) were scheduled to enter the study. All patients had a preoperative computed tomography scan evaluation to plan bone resections. The PSTs were positioned intraoperatively according to the best-fit technique and their three-dimensional orientation was recorded by a navigation system. The position of the femur and tibia PST was compared to the planned position for four items for each component: coronal and sagittal orientation, medial and lateral height of resection. Items were summarized to obtain knee, femur and tibia PST scores, respectively. These scores were plotted according to chronological order and included in a CUSUM analysis. The tested hypothesis was that the PST process for TKA was immediately under control after its introduction.

Results: CUSUM test showed that positioning of the PST significantly differed from the target throughout the study. There was a significant difference between all scores and the maximal score. No case obtained the maximal score of eight points. The study was interrupted after 20 cases because of this negative evaluation.

Conclusion: The CUSUM test is effective in monitoring the learning curve when introducing a new surgical procedure. Introducing PST for TKA in an academic department may be associated with a long-lasting learning curve. The study was registered on the clinical.gov website (Identifier NCT02429245).

Citing Articles

Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.

Pelkowski J, Young P, OConnor M, Sherman C, McElroy M, Ledford C J Orthop. 2023; 46:124-127.

PMID: 37994363 PMC: 10659996. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.034.


An objective approach to evaluate novice robotic surgeons using a combination of kinematics and stepwise cumulative sum (CUSUM) analyses.

Lyman W, Passeri M, Murphy K, Siddiqui I, Khan A, Iannitti D Surg Endosc. 2020; 35(6):2765-2772.

PMID: 32556751 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07708-z.


Postoperative mechanical alignment analysis of total knee replacement patients operated with 3D printed patient specific instruments: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Can Gemalmaz H, Sariyilmaz K, Ozkunt O, Sungur M, Kaya I, Dikici F Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019; 53(5):323-328.

PMID: 30853398 PMC: 6819789. DOI: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.02.001.