» Articles » PMID: 28393278

Anthracycline-based Triplets Do Not Improve the Efficacy of Platinum-fluoropyrimidine Doublets in First-line Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: Real-world Data from the AGAMEMON National Cancer Registry

Abstract

Background: Although anthracycline-based triplets are one of the most widely used schedules to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the benefit of including epirubicin in these therapeutic combinations remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate both the efficacy and tolerance of triplets with epirubicin vs. doublets with platinum-fluoropyrimidine in a national AGC registry.

Methods: Patients with AGC treated with polychemotherapy without trastuzumab at 28 hospitals in Spain between 2008 and 2016 were included. The effect of anthracycline-based triplets against doublets was evaluated by propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression.

Result: A total of 1002 patients were included (doublets, n = 653; anthracycline-based triplets, n = 349). The multivariable Cox PH regression failed to detect significantly increased OS in favor of triplets with anthracyclines: HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.05), p = 0.20035. After PSM, the sample contained 325 pairs with similar baseline characteristics. This method was also unable to reveal an increase in OS: 10.5 (95% CI, 9.7-12.3) vs. 9.9 (95% CI, 9.2-11.4) months, HR 0.91 (CI 95%, 0.76-1.083), and (log-rank test, p = 0.226). Response rates (42.1 vs. 33.1%, p = 0.12) and PFS (HR 0.95, CI 95%, 0.80-1.13, log-rank test, p = 0.873) were not significantly higher with epirubicin-based regimens. The triplets were associated with greater grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, and increased hospitalization due to toxicity by 68%. The addition of epirubicin is viable, but 23.7% discontinued treatment because of adverse effects or patient decision.

Conclusion: Anthracyclines added to platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets did not improve the response rate or survival outcomes in patients with AGC but entailed greater toxicity.

Citing Articles

Does HER2 status influence in the benefit of ramucirumab and paclitaxel as second line treatment of advanced gastro-esophageal adenocarcinoma? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

Valcarcel S, Gallego J, Jimenez-Fonseca P, Diez M, de Castro E, Hernandez R J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 149(7):4077-4089.

PMID: 36042046 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04294-6.


Sex and gender disparities in patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

Plazas J, Arias-Martinez A, Lecumberri A, Martinez de Castro E, Custodio A, Cano J ESMO Open. 2022; 7(3):100514.

PMID: 35714478 PMC: 9271495. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100514.


A population-based study in synchronous metachronous metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.

Pape M, Vissers P, Bertwistle D, McDonald L, Slingerland M, Haj Mohammad N Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022; 14:17588359221085557.

PMID: 35356260 PMC: 8958715. DOI: 10.1177/17588359221085557.


Identification of Thrombosis-Related Genes in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer: Data from AGAMENON-SEOM Registry.

Zaragoza-Huesca D, Garrido-Rodriguez P, Jimenez-Fonseca P, de Castro E, Sanchez-Canovas M, Visa L Biomedicines. 2022; 10(1).

PMID: 35052827 PMC: 8773420. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10010148.


External validity of clinical trials with diverse trastuzumab-based chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: data from the AGAMENON-SEOM registry.

Jimenez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Martinez-Torron A, Alsina M, Custodio A, Serra O Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021; 13:17588359211019672.

PMID: 34211587 PMC: 8216357. DOI: 10.1177/17588359211019672.


References
1.
Chen X, Chen X, Yang C, Liao Y, Li H, Wang L . Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) regimen compared with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(4):e60320. PMC: 3617226. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060320. View

2.
Wagner A, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig W . Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(18):2903-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0245. View

3.
Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko V, Tjulandin S, Majlis A, Constenla M, Boni C . Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(31):4991-7. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8429. View

4.
Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, Iveson T, Nicolson M, Coxon F . Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358(1):36-46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa073149. View

5.
Jimenez-Fonseca P, Carmona-Bayonas A, Lorenzo M, Gallego Plazas J, Custodio A, Hernandez R . Prognostic significance of performing universal HER2 testing in cases of advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2016; 20(3):465-474. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-016-0639-8. View