» Articles » PMID: 28392808

Consumer Preferences for Food Allergen Labeling

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 11
PMID 28392808
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Food allergen labeling is an important tool to reduce risk of exposure and prevent anaphylaxis for individuals with food allergies. Health Canada released a Canadian food allergen labeling regulation (2008) and subsequent update (2012) suggesting that research is needed to guide further iterations of the regulation to improve food allergen labeling and reduce risk of exposure.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine consumer preferences in food labeling for allergy avoidance and anaphylaxis prevention. A secondary objective was to identify whether different subgroups within the consumer population emerged.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment using a fractional factorial design divided into ten different versions with 18 choice-sets per version was developed to examine consumer preferences for different attributes of food labeling.

Results: Three distinct subgroups of Canadian consumers with different allergen considerations and food allergen labeling needs were identified. Overall, preferences for standardized precautionary and safety symbols at little or no increased cost emerged.

Conclusion: While three distinct groups with different preferences were identified, in general the results revealed that the current Canadian food allergen labeling regulation can be improved by enforcing the use of standardized precautionary and safety symbols and educating the public on the use of these symbols.

Citing Articles

Challenge of Precautionary Allergen Labeling for Ensuring the Safety of Children With Food Allergies.

Lee J, Kim S, Jeong K, Koo J, Lee S J Korean Med Sci. 2024; 39(48):e307.

PMID: 39688330 PMC: 11650331. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e307.


Cell-based, cell-cultured, cell-cultivated, cultured, or cultivated. What is the best name for meat, poultry, and seafood made directly from the cells of animals?.

Hallman W, Hallman 2nd W, Hallman E NPJ Sci Food. 2023; 7(1):62.

PMID: 38057390 PMC: 10700563. DOI: 10.1038/s41538-023-00234-x.


Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Consumers on Food Allergy and Food Allergen Labeling: A Case of Lebanon.

Chafei H, El Harake M, Toufeili I, Kharroubi S Foods. 2023; 12(5).

PMID: 36900450 PMC: 10000957. DOI: 10.3390/foods12050933.


Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Chitosan-Derived and Biofermentation-Derived Glucosamine in Nutritional Supplement for Bone Health.

Kang H, Kim S, Yeo E, Hong J, Rajgopal A, Hu C Nutrients. 2022; 14(15).

PMID: 35956389 PMC: 9370395. DOI: 10.3390/nu14153213.


Poor understanding of allergen labelling by allergic and non-allergic consumers.

Holleman B, van Os-Medendorp H, van den Bergh H, van Dijk L, Linders Y, Blom W Clin Exp Allergy. 2021; 51(10):1374-1382.

PMID: 34288165 PMC: 8519062. DOI: 10.1111/cea.13975.


References
1.
Sampson H . Update on food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113(5):805-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.03.014. View

2.
Rona R, Keil T, Summers C, Gislason D, Zuidmeer L, Sodergren E . The prevalence of food allergy: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 120(3):638-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.026. View

3.
Anandan C, Sheikh A . European developments in labelling allergenic foods. BMJ. 2005; 331(7526):1155-6. PMC: 1285081. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.331.7526.1155. View

4.
Guimaraes C, Marra C, Gill S, Simpson S, Meneilly G, Queiroz R . A discrete choice experiment evaluation of patients' preferences for different risk, benefit, and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes management. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011; 4:433-40. PMC: 3034358. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S14217. View

5.
Lagarde M, Blaauw D . A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions. Hum Resour Health. 2009; 7:62. PMC: 2724490. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-62. View