» Articles » PMID: 28392766

Presence and Absence of Muscle Contraction Elicited by Peripheral Nerve Electrical Stimulation Differentially Modulate Primary Motor Cortex Excitability

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2017 Apr 11
PMID 28392766
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Modulation of cortical excitability by sensory inputs is a critical component of sensorimotor integration. Sensory afferents, including muscle and joint afferents, to somatosensory cortex (S1) modulate primary motor cortex (M1) excitability, but the effects of muscle and joint afferents specifically activated by muscle contraction are unknown. We compared motor evoked potentials (MEPs) following median nerve stimulation (MNS) above and below the contraction threshold based on the persistence of M-waves. Peripheral nerve electrical stimulation (PES) conditions, including right MNS at the wrist at 110% motor threshold (MT; 110% MNS condition), right MNS at the index finger (sensory digit nerve stimulation [DNS]) with stimulus intensity approximately 110% MNS (DNS condition), and right MNS at the wrist at 90% MT (90% MNS condition) were applied. PES was administered in a 4 s ON and 6 s OFF cycle for 20 min at 30 Hz. In Experiment 1 ( = 15), MEPs were recorded from the right abductor pollicis brevis (APB) before (baseline) and after PES. In Experiment 2 ( = 15), M- and F-waves were recorded from the right APB. Stimulation at 110% MNS at the wrist evoking muscle contraction increased MEP amplitudes after PES compared with those at baseline, whereas DNS at the index finger and 90% MNS at the wrist not evoking muscle contraction decreased MEP amplitudes after PES. M- and F-waves, which reflect spinal cord or muscular and neuromuscular junctions, did not change following PES. These results suggest that muscle contraction and concomitant muscle/joint afferent inputs specifically enhance M1 excitability.

Citing Articles

Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation Combined With Functional Electrical Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability and Upper Extremity Fine Motor Function.

Desai N, Grippe T, Arora T, Bhattacharya A, Gunraj C, Chen R Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70318.

PMID: 39935111 PMC: 11813982. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70318.


Exploring sensory, motor, and pain responses as potential side or therapeutic effects of sub-2 mA, 400 Hz transcranial pulsed current stimulation.

Jaberzadeh S, Zoghi M PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0290137.

PMID: 38091312 PMC: 10718437. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290137.


Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans.

Koseki T, Kudo D, Yoshida K, Nito M, Takano K, Jin M Front Neurosci. 2023; 16:1034451.

PMID: 37091256 PMC: 10115158. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1034451.


Effects of motor stimulation of the tibial nerve on corticospinal excitability of abductor hallucis and pelvic floor muscles.

Eginyan G, Zhou X, Williams A, Lam T Front Rehabil Sci. 2023; 3:1089223.

PMID: 36726808 PMC: 9884817. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.1089223.


Difference between the Effects of Peripheral Sensory Nerve Electrical Stimulation on the Excitability of the Primary Motor Cortex: Examination of the Combinations of Stimulus Frequency and Duration.

Sato M, Mutai H, Iwanami J, Noji A, Sugimoto S, Ozawa K Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552097 PMC: 9775552. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121637.


References
1.
Sanes J, Mauritz K, Evarts E, Dalakas M, Chu A . Motor deficits in patients with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984; 81(3):979-82. PMC: 344963. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.3.979. View

2.
Saito K, Onishi H, Miyaguchi S, Kotan S, Fujimoto S . Effect of Paired-Pulse Electrical Stimulation on the Activity of Cortical Circuits. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 9:671. PMC: 4687412. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00671. View

3.
Tinazzi M, Zarattini S, Valeriani M, Romito S, Farina S, Moretto G . Long-lasting modulation of human motor cortex following prolonged transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of forearm muscles: evidence of reciprocal inhibition and facilitation. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 161(4):457-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2091-y. View

4.
Chipchase L, Schabrun S, Hodges P . Corticospinal excitability is dependent on the parameters of peripheral electric stimulation: a preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(9):1423-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.011. View

5.
Naito E, Roland P, Ehrsson H . I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron. 2002; 36(5):979-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00980-7. View