» Articles » PMID: 28387482

Proximity-dependent Labeling Methods for Proteomic Profiling in Living Cells

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2017 Apr 8
PMID 28387482
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Characterizing the proteome composition of organelles and subcellular regions of living cells can facilitate the understanding of cellular organization as well as protein interactome networks. Proximity labeling-based methods coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) offer a high-throughput approach for systematic analysis of spatially restricted proteomes. Proximity labeling utilizes enzymes that generate reactive radicals to covalently tag neighboring proteins with biotin. The biotinylated endogenous proteins can then be isolated for further analysis by MS. To analyze protein-protein interactions or identify components that localize to discrete subcellular compartments, spatial expression is achieved by fusing the enzyme to specific proteins or signal peptides that target to particular subcellular regions. Although these technologies have only been introduced recently, they have already provided deep insights into a wide range of biological processes. Here, we describe and compare current methods of proximity labeling as well as their applications. As each method has its own unique features, the goal of this review is to describe how different proximity labeling methods can be used to answer different biological questions. WIREs Dev Biol 2017, 6:e272. doi: 10.1002/wdev.272 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Citing Articles

: Precise Proteomics Technology for Mapping Receptor Protein Neighborhoods at the Cancer Cell Surface.

Rahmati S, Emili A Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39857961 PMC: 11763998. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020179.


Revealing and mitigating the inhibitory effect of serotonin on HRP-mediated protein labelling.

Chan Z, Qi C, Cai Y, Li X, Ren J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):32126.

PMID: 39738643 PMC: 11686078. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83928-w.


Mapping the cancer surface proteome in search of target antigens for immunotherapy.

Di Meo F, Kale B, Koomen J, Perna F Mol Ther. 2024; 32(9):2892-2904.

PMID: 39068512 PMC: 11403220. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.07.019.


Method for B Cell Receptor Enrichment in Malignant B Cells.

Bhattacharyya P, Christopherson R, Skarratt K, Fuller S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001403 PMC: 11240526. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132341.


ACKR3 Proximity Labeling Identifies Novel G protein- and β-arrestin-independent GPCR Interacting Proteins.

Hicks C, Gardner J, Eiger D, Camarda N, Pham U, Dhar S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38410489 PMC: 10896341. DOI: 10.1101/2024.01.27.577545.


References
1.
Cronan Jr J . Molecular biology of biotin attachment to proteins. J Nutr. 1999; 129(2S Suppl):477S-484S. DOI: 10.1093/jn/129.2.477S. View

2.
Zhou Q, Hu H, Li Z . An EF-hand-containing Protein in Trypanosoma brucei Regulates Cytokinesis Initiation by Maintaining the Stability of the Cytokinesis Initiation Factor CIF1. J Biol Chem. 2016; 291(28):14395-409. PMC: 4938165. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.726133. View

3.
Fernandez-Suarez M, Chen T, Ting A . Protein-protein interaction detection in vitro and in cells by proximity biotinylation. J Am Chem Soc. 2008; 130(29):9251-3. PMC: 2635094. DOI: 10.1021/ja801445p. View

4.
Ryan B, Carolan N, OFagain C . Horseradish and soybean peroxidases: comparable tools for alternative niches?. Trends Biotechnol. 2006; 24(8):355-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.007. View

5.
Roux K, Kim D, Raida M, Burke B . A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2012; 196(6):801-10. PMC: 3308701. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201112098. View