Differences in Arithmetic Performance Between Chinese and German Adults Are Accompanied by Differences in Processing of Non-symbolic Numerical Magnitude

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2017 Apr 7

PMID 28384191

Authors

Jan Lonnemann

Su Li

Pei Zhao

Peng Li

Janosch Linkersdorfer

Sven Lindberg

Marcus Hasselhorn

Song Yan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human beings are assumed to possess an approximate number system (ANS) dedicated to extracting and representing approximate numerical magnitude information. The ANS is assumed to be fundamental to arithmetic learning and has been shown to be associated with arithmetic performance. It is, however, still a matter of debate whether better arithmetic skills are reflected in the ANS. To address this issue, Chinese and German adults were compared regarding their performance in simple arithmetic tasks and in a non-symbolic numerical magnitude comparison task. Chinese participants showed a better performance in solving simple arithmetic tasks and faster reaction times in the non-symbolic numerical magnitude comparison task without making more errors than their German peers. These differences in performance could not be ascribed to differences in general cognitive abilities. Better arithmetic skills were thus found to be accompanied by a higher speed of retrieving non-symbolic numerical magnitude knowledge but not by a higher precision of non-symbolic numerical magnitude representations. The group difference in the speed of retrieving non-symbolic numerical magnitude knowledge was fully mediated by the performance in arithmetic tasks, suggesting that arithmetic skills shape non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills.

References

Fazio L, Bailey D, Thompson C, Siegler R . Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014; 123:53-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.01.013. View

van Oeffelen M, Vos P . A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Percept Psychophys. 1982; 32(2):163-70. DOI: 10.3758/bf03204275. View

Halberda J, Ly R, Wilmer J, Naiman D, Germine L . Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109(28):11116-20. PMC: 3396479. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200196109. View

Chen Q, Li J . Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: a meta-analysis. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014; 148:163-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016. View

Castronovo J, Gobel S . Impact of high mathematics education on the number sense. PLoS One. 2012; 7(4):e33832. PMC: 3338810. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033832. View

Guillaume M, Nys J, Mussolin C, Content A . Differences in the acuity of the Approximate Number System in adults: the effect of mathematical ability. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013; 144(3):506-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.09.001. View

Preacher K, Hayes A . Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008; 40(3):879-91. DOI: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879. View

Izard V, Sann C, Spelke E, Streri A . Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(25):10382-5. PMC: 2700913. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812142106. View

Zebian S, Ansari D . Differences between literates and illiterates on symbolic but not nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing. Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 19(1):93-100. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0175-9. View

10.

Hayes A, Preacher K . Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2013; 67(3):451-70. DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12028. View

11.

Lindskog M, Winman A, Juslin P . The association between higher education and approximate number system acuity. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:462. PMC: 4033103. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00462. View

12.

Leibovich T, Katzin N, Harel M, Henik A . From "sense of number" to "sense of magnitude": The role of continuous magnitudes in numerical cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2016; 40:e164. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000960. View

13.

Campbell J, Xue Q . Cognitive arithmetic across cultures. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001; 130(2):299-315. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.299. View

14.

Piazza M, Pica P, Izard V, Spelke E, Dehaene S . Education enhances the acuity of the nonverbal approximate number system. Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(6):1037-43. PMC: 4648254. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464057. View

15.

Gebuis T, Cohen Kadosh R, Gevers W . Sensory-integration system rather than approximate number system underlies numerosity processing: A critical review. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016; 171:17-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.09.003. View

16.

Zhou X, Wei W, Zhang Y, Cui J, Chen C . Visual perception can account for the close relation between numerosity processing and computational fluency. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1364. PMC: 4563146. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01364. View

17.

Schneider M, Beeres K, Coban L, Merz S, Susan Schmidt S, Stricker J . Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. Dev Sci. 2016; 20(3). DOI: 10.1111/desc.12372. View

18.

Inglis M, Gilmore C . Indexing the approximate number system. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013; 145:147-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.009. View

19.

Dietrich J, Huber S, Klein E, Willmes K, Pixner S, Moeller K . A Systematic Investigation of Accuracy and Response Time Based Measures Used to Index ANS Acuity. PLoS One. 2016; 11(9):e0163076. PMC: 5026358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163076. View

20.

Piazza M . Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010; 14(12):542-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.008. View