A Brief Review and Evaluation of Earthworm Biomarkers in Soil Pollution Assessment

Overview

Journal Environ Sci Pollut Res Int

Publisher Springer

Specialties Environmental Health
Toxicology

Date 2017 Apr 7

PMID 28382452

Citations 13

Authors

Zhiming Shi

Zhiwen Tang

Congying Wang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Earthworm biomarker response to pollutants has been widely investigated in the assessment of soil pollution. However, whether and how the earthworm biomarker-approach can be actually applied to soil pollution assessment is still a controversial issue. This review is concerned about the following points: 1. Despite much debate, biomarker is valuable to ecotoxicology and biomarker approach has been properly used in different fields. Earthworm biomarker might be used in different scenarios such as large-scale soil pollution survey and soil pollution risk assessment. Compared with physicochemical analysis, they can provide more comprehensive and straightforward information about soil pollution at low cost. 2. Although many earthworm species from different ecological categories have been tested, Eisenia fetida/andrei is commonly used. Many earthworm biomarkers have been screened from the molecular to the individual level, while only a few biomarkers, such as avoidance behavior and lysosomal membrane stability, have been focused on. Other aspects of the experimental design were critically reviewed. 3. More studies should focus on determining the reliability of various earthworm biomarkers in soil pollution assessment in future research. Besides, establishing a database of a basal level of each biomarker, exploring biomarker response in different region/section/part of earthworm, and other issues are also proposed. 4. A set of research guideline for earthworm biomarker studies was recommended, and the suitability of several earthworm biomarkers was briefly evaluated with respect to their application in soil pollution assessment. This review will help to promote further studies and practical application of earthworm biomarker in soil pollution assessment.

Citing Articles

Microbial biosurfactant-mediated green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and exploring their role in enhancing chickpea and rice seed germination.

Das I, Borah D Discov Nano. 2024; 19(1):174.

PMID: 39487377 PMC: 11530582. DOI: 10.1186/s11671-024-04134-1.

Current Developments in Soil Ecotoxicology.

Fernandez-Marcos M Toxics. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39453154 PMC: 11511362. DOI: 10.3390/toxics12100734.

Proposal for a framework for environmental zoning of areas near gold mines based on the distribution of potentially toxic elements, pollution indices, and bioindicators: a case study in Antioquia, Colombia.

Lopez J, Marin J, Saldarriaga J Environ Monit Assess. 2024; 196(10):933.

PMID: 39271620 PMC: 11399291. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13079-y.

Remediation of Pb-contaminated soil using biochar-based slow-release P fertilizer and biomonitoring employing bioindicators.

Acosta-Luque M, Lopez J, Henao N, Zapata D, Giraldo J, Saldarriaga J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1657.

PMID: 36717659 PMC: 9886935. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-27043-8.

Effects of straw returning combined with earthworm addition on nitrification and ammonia oxidizers in paddy soil.

Chu X, Bai N, Zheng X, Wang Q, Pan X, Li S Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1069554.

PMID: 36590424 PMC: 9800607. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1069554.

References

Panzarino O, Hyrsl P, Dobes P, Vojtek L, Vernile P, Bari G . Rank-based biomarker index to assess cadmium ecotoxicity on the earthworm Eisenia andrei. Chemosphere. 2015; 145:480-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.077. View

Paone J, Waalkes T, Baker R, Shaper J . Serum UDP-galactosyl transferase as a potential biomarker for breast carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 1980; 15(1):59-66. DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930150110. View

Wu S, Wu E, Qiu L, Zhong W, Chen J . Effects of phenanthrene on the mortality, growth, and anti-oxidant system of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) under laboratory conditions. Chemosphere. 2011; 83(4):429-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.12.082. View

Gambi N, Pasteris A, Fabbri E . Acetylcholinesterase activity in the earthworm Eisenia andrei at different conditions of carbaryl exposure. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007; 145(4):678-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.03.002. View

Hu S, Zhang W, Li J, Lin K, Ji R . Antioxidant and gene expression responses of Eisenia fetida following repeated exposure to BDE209 and Pb in a soil-earthworm system. Sci Total Environ. 2016; 556:163-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.194. View

Ankley G, Bennett R, Erickson R, Hoff D, Hornung M, Johnson R . Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2010; 29(3):730-41. DOI: 10.1002/etc.34. View

Calisi A, Lionetto M, Schettino T . Biomarker response in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris exposed to chemical pollutants. Sci Total Environ. 2011; 409(20):4456-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.058. View

Lanno R, Wells J, Conder J, Bradham K, Basta N . The bioavailability of chemicals in soil for earthworms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2003; 57(1):39-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.08.014. View

Denoyelle R, Rault M, Mazzia C, Mascle O, Capowiez Y . Cholinesterase activity as a biomarker of pesticide exposure in Allolobophora chlorotica earthworms living in apple orchards under different management strategies. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2007; 26(12):2644-9. DOI: 10.1897/06-355.1. View

10.

Lukkari T, Taavitsainen M, Soimasuo M, Oikari A, Haimi J . Biomarker responses of the earthworm Aporrectodea tuberculata to copper and zinc exposure: differences between populations with and without earlier metal exposure. Environ Pollut. 2004; 129(3):377-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.12.008. View

11.

Shi Z, Xu L, Wang N, Zhang W, Li H, Hu F . Pseudo-basal levels of and distribution of anti-oxidant enzyme biomarkers in Eisenia fetida and effect of exposure to phenanthrene. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013; 95:33-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.05.009. View

12.

Forbes V, Palmqvist A, Bach L . The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006; 25(1):272-80. DOI: 10.1897/05-257r.1. View

13.

Wu S, Zhang H, Zhao S, Wang J, Li H, Chen J . Biomarker responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposured to phenanthrene and pyrene both singly and combined in microcosms. Chemosphere. 2012; 87(4):285-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.11.055. View

14.

Lin D, Zhou Q, Xie X, Liu Y . Potential biochemical and genetic toxicity of triclosan as an emerging pollutant on earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Chemosphere. 2010; 81(10):1328-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.027. View

15.

Usman A, Lee S, Awad Y, Lim K, Yang J, Ok Y . Soil pollution assessment and identification of hyperaccumulating plants in chromated copper arsenate (CCA) contaminated sites, Korea. Chemosphere. 2012; 87(8):872-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.028. View

16.

Kolar L, Erzen N, Hogerwerf L, van Gestel C . Toxicity of abamectin and doramectin to soil invertebrates. Environ Pollut. 2007; 151(1):182-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.02.011. View

17.

Nahmani J, Hodson M, Black S . A review of studies performed to assess metal uptake by earthworms. Environ Pollut. 2006; 145(2):402-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.009. View

18.

Scott-Fordsmand J, Weeks J . Biomarkers in earthworms. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2000; 165:117-59. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1172-3_3. View

19.

Asensio V, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Garmendia L, Andre J, Kille P, Morgan A . Towards an integrative soil health assessment strategy: a three tier (integrative biomarker response) approach with Eisenia fetida applied to soils subjected to chronic metal pollution. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 442:344-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.09.048. View

20.

Depledge M, Fossi M . The role of biomarkers in environmental assessment (2). Invertebrates. Ecotoxicology. 2013; 3(3):161-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00117081. View