» Articles » PMID: 28381307

Reasons for Non-recruitment of Eligible Patients to a Randomised Controlled Trial of Secondary Prevention After Intracerebral Haemorrhage: Observational Study

Abstract

Background: Recruitment to randomised prevention trials is challenging, not least for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) associated with antithrombotic drug use. We investigated reasons for not recruiting apparently eligible patients at hospital sites that keep screening logs in the ongoing REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART), which seeks to determine whether to start antiplatelet drugs after ICH.

Method: By the end of May 2015, 158 participants had been recruited at 108 active sites in RESTART. The trial coordinating centre invited all sites that kept screening logs to submit screening log data, followed by one reminder. We checked the integrity of data, focused on the completeness of data about potentially eligible patients and categorised the reasons they were not randomised.

Results: Of 108 active sites, 39 (36%) provided usable screening log data over a median of ten (interquartile range = 5-13) months of recruitment per site. During this time, sites screened 633 potentially eligible patients and randomised 53 (8%) of them. The main reasons why 580 patients were not randomised were: 43 (7%) patients started anticoagulation, 51 (9%) patients declined, 148 (26%) patients' stroke physicians were not uncertain about using antiplatelet drugs, 162 (28%) patients were too unwell and 176 (30%) patients were not randomised due to other reasons.

Conclusion: RESTART recruited ~8% of eligible patients. If more physicians were uncertain about the therapeutic dilemma that RESTART is addressing, RESTART could have recruited up to four times as many participants. The trial coordinating centre continues to engage with physicians about their uncertainty.

Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials, EudraCT 2012-003190-26 . Registered on 3 July 2012.

Citing Articles

The MATE trial: a multicentre, mixed-methodology, pilot, randomised controlled trial in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Airody A, Baseler H, Seymour J, Allgar V, Mukherjee R, Downey L Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):63.

PMID: 37081576 PMC: 10116669. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01288-0.


Risks of recurrent stroke and all serious vascular events after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: pooled analyses of two population-based studies.

Li L, Poon M, Samarasekera N, Perry L, Moullaali T, Rodrigues M Lancet Neurol. 2021; 20(6):437-447.

PMID: 34022170 PMC: 8134058. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00075-2.


Safety and efficacy of restarting antiplatelet therapy after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Eun M, Jung J Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(Suppl 6):S218.

PMID: 31656797 PMC: 6789309. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.08.96.


Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial.

Lancet. 2019; 393(10191):2613-2623.

PMID: 31128924 PMC: 6617509. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30840-2.


The REstart or STop Antithrombotics Randomised Trial (RESTART) after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage: statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.

Salman R, Murray G, Dennis M, Newby D, Sandercock P, Sprigg N Trials. 2019; 20(1):183.

PMID: 30909946 PMC: 6434884. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3270-2.


References
1.
Pasquini M, Charidimou A, van Asch C, Baharoglu M, Samarasekera N, Werring D . Variation in restarting antithrombotic drugs at hospital discharge after intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2014; 45(9):2643-8. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006202. View

2.
Hansen B, Ullman N, Norrving B, Hanley D, Lindgren A . Applicability of Clinical Trials in an Unselected Cohort of Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2016; 47(10):2634-7. PMC: 5328273. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014203. View

3.
McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J . What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006; 7:9. PMC: 1475627. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. View

4.
Duchesne G, Woo H, Howell D, Kaimakamis M, Kemp E . Tribulations of a prostate cancer trial – lessons learned from TOAD, a Cancer Council Victoria and Transtasman Radiation Oncology Group trial. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2010; 54(5):508-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2010.02204.x. View

5.
Fonville A, Samarasekera N, Hutchison A, Perry D, Roos Y, Salman R . Eligibility for randomized trials of treatments specifically for intracerebral hemorrhage: community-based study. Stroke. 2013; 44(10):2729-34. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001493. View