» Articles » PMID: 28375437

Achalasia-an Unnecessary Long Way to Diagnosis

Overview
Journal Dis Esophagus
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Apr 5
PMID 28375437
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although achalasia presents with typical symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss, and atypical chest pain, the time until first diagnosis often takes years and is frustrating for patients and nevertheless associated with high costs for the healthcare system. A total of 563 patients were interviewed with confirmed diagnosis of achalasia regarding their symptoms leading to diagnosis along with past clinical examinations and treatments. Included were patients who had undergone their medical investigations in Germany. Overall, 527 study subjects were included (male 46%, female 54%, mean age at time of interview 51 ± 14.8 years). Dysphagia was present in 86.7%, regurgitation in 82.9%, atypical chest pain in 79%, and weight loss in 58% of patients before diagnosis. On average, it took 25 months (Interquartile Range (IQR) 9-65) until confirmation of correct diagnosis of achalasia. Though, diagnosis was confirmed significantly quicker (35 months IQR 9-89 vs. 20 months IQR 8-53; p < 0.01) in the past 15 years. The majority (72.1%) was transferred to three or more specialists. Almost each patient underwent at least one esophagogastroduodenoscopy (94.2%) and one radiological assessment (89.3%). However, esophageal manometry was performed in 70.4% of patients only. The severity of symptoms was independent with regard to duration until first diagnosis (Eckardt score 7.14 ± 2.64 within 12 months vs. 7.29 ± 2.61 longer than 12 months; P = 0.544). Fifty-five percent of the patients primarily underwent endoscopic dilatation and 37% a surgical myotomy. Endoscopic dilatation was realized significantly faster compared to esophageal myotomy (1 month IQR 0-4 vs. 3 months IQR 1-11; p < 0.001). Although diagnosis of achalasia was significantly faster in the past 15 years, it still takes almost 2 years until the correct diagnosis of achalasia is confirmed. Alarming is the fact that although esophageal manometry is known as the gold standard to differentiate primary motility disorders, only three out of four patients had undergone this diagnostic pathway during their diagnostic work-up. Better education of medical professionals and broader utilization of highly sensitive diagnostic tools, such as high-resolution manometry, are strictly necessary in order to correctly diagnose affected patients and to offer therapy faster.

Citing Articles

Editorial: The Role of Esophageal Manometry in Diagnosing Achalasia and Esophageal Motility Disorders: Challenges and Advances.

Chuah K JGH Open. 2025; 9(1):e70093.

PMID: 39791010 PMC: 11711043. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70093.


A Modified Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing Evaluating Esophageal Dysphagia by a Capsule: A Pilot Study.

Slovik Y, Kaminer B, Revital G, Ron A, Harris M, Ziv O Dysphagia. 2024; 40(1):263-270.

PMID: 38872056 PMC: 11762649. DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10724-z.


Two onset types of achalasia and the long-term course to diagnosis.

Kurosugi A, Matsumura T, Sonoda M, Kaneko T, Takahashi S, Okimoto K Esophagus. 2024; 21(4):546-551.

PMID: 38844704 PMC: 11405443. DOI: 10.1007/s10388-024-01069-5.


Clinical and functional outcome following robotic Heller-myotomy with partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia.

Rabe S, Burmeister E, Niebisch S, Gockel I J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(4):1689-1696.

PMID: 36964851 PMC: 10374681. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01557-3.


Childhood esophageal achalasia: Case report from Afghanistan with literature review.

Hakimi T, Karimi R Int J Surg Case Rep. 2022; 94:107112.

PMID: 35658288 PMC: 9118120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107112.