Restraint Use in Older Adults Receiving Home Care
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: To determine the prevalence, types, frequency, and duration of restraint use in older adults receiving home nursing care and to determine factors involved in the decision-making process for restraint use and application.
Design: Cross-sectional survey of restraint use in older adults receiving home care completed by primary care nurses.
Setting: Homes of older adults receiving care from a home nursing organization in Belgium.
Participants: Randomized sample of older adults receiving home care (N = 6,397; mean age 80.6; 66.8% female).
Measurements: For each participant, nurses completed an investigator-constructed and -validated questionnaire collecting information demographic, clinical, and behavioral characteristics and aspects of restraint use. A broad definition of restraint was used that includes a range of restrictive actions.
Results: Restraints were used in 24.7% of the participants, mostly on a daily basis (85%) and often for a long period (54.5%, 24 h/d). The most common reason for restraint use was safety (50.2%). Other reasons were that the individual wanted to remain at home longer, which necessitated the use of restraints (18.2%) and to provide respite for the informal caregiver (8.6%). The latter played an important role in the decision and application process. The physician was less involved in the process. In 64.5% of cases, there was no evaluation after restraint use was initiated.
Conclusion: Use of restraints is common in older adults receiving home care nursing in Belgium. These results contribute to a better understanding of the complexity of use of restraints in home care, a situation that may be even more complex than in nursing homes and acute hospital settings.
Lampersberger L, Bauer S, Osmancevic S Health Soc Care Community. 2022; 30(6):e3656-e3669.
PMID: 36102616 PMC: 10087905. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14021.
Palese A, Longhini J, Businarolo A, Piccin T, Pitacco G, Bicego L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(23).
PMID: 34886489 PMC: 8657237. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312764.
Vandervelde S, Scheepmans K, Milisen K, van Achterberg T, Vlaeyen E, Flamaing J BMC Geriatr. 2021; 21(1):77.
PMID: 33494710 PMC: 7831193. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01946-5.
Involuntary treatment in dementia care at home: Results from the Netherlands and Belgium.
Mengelers A, Moermans V, Bleijlevens M, Verbeek H, Capezuti E, Tan F J Clin Nurs. 2020; 31(13-14):1998-2007.
PMID: 32918342 PMC: 9292312. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15457.
Scheepmans K, de Casterle B, Paquay L, Van Gansbeke H, Milisen K BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):169.
PMID: 32380959 PMC: 7204038. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-1499-y.