Independent Association Between Socioeconomic Indicators and Macro- and Micro-nutrient Intake in Switzerland
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Socioeconomic differences in diet are rarely assessed with more than one indicator. We aimed to assess differences in macro- and micro-nutrient intake in both sexes according to education, income, and occupation.
Methods: We used data from validated food frequency questionnaire measured dietary intake in 5087 participants (2157 women) from yearly adult population-based cross-sectional surveys conducted from 2005 to 2012 in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland. We used two ANOVA models: age-adjusted and multivariable adjusted simultaneously for all three socioeconomic indicators.
Results: Low-education men consumed more calcium but less vitamin D than high-education men; low-income men consumed less total and animal protein (80.9±0.9 vs 84.0±0.6 g/d; 55.6±1.0 vs 59.5±0.7 g/d) and more total carbohydrates and sugars (246±2 vs 235±2 g/d; 108±2 vs 103±1 g/d) than high-income men. Occupation and diet showed no association. Low-education women consumed less vegetable protein (20.7±0.2 vs 21.6±0.2 g/d), fibre (15.7±0.3 vs 16.8±0.2 g/d), and carotene (4222±158 vs 4870±128 μg/d) than high-education women; low-income women consumed more total carbohydrates (206±2 vs 197±1 g/d) and less monounsaturated fat (27.7±0.4 vs 29.3±0.3 g/d) than high-income women. Finally, low-occupation women consumed more total energy (1792±27 vs 1714±15 kcal/d) and total carbohydrates (206±2 vs 200±1 g/d), but less saturated fat (23.0±0.3 vs 24.4±0.2 g/d), calcium (935±17 vs 997±10 mg/d) and vitamin D (2.5±0.1 vs 2.9±0.1 μg/d), than high-occupation women.
Conclusion: In Switzerland, the influence of socioeconomic factors on nutrient intake differs by sex; income and education, but not occupation, drive differences among men; among women, all three indicators seem to play a role. Interventions to reduce inequalities should consider the influence of education, income, and occupation in diet to be most effective.
Consumer Acceptance of Texture-Modified Mackerel Stew Products in Older Adults.
Seo H, Chung S, Cho M, Park J, Oh J Foods. 2023; 12(22).
PMID: 38002107 PMC: 10670800. DOI: 10.3390/foods12224049.
Editorial: Diet quality, socioeconomic differences, and health disparities.
Nisa H, Kurotani K Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1250439.
PMID: 37497062 PMC: 10368182. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1250439.
The Impact of Social Well-Being on Population Diet Nutritional Value and Antiradical Status.
Gorbachev V, Nikitin I, Velina D, Zhuchenko N, Kosenkov A, Sokolov A Foods. 2023; 12(13).
PMID: 37444358 PMC: 10341064. DOI: 10.3390/foods12132619.
Developing a Socioeconomic Status Index for Chronic Disease Prevention Research in Canada.
Khodayari Moez E, Maximova K, Sim S, Senthilselvan A, Pabayo R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(13).
PMID: 35805461 PMC: 9265839. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137800.
Vitamin D Intake in Slovenian Adolescents, Adults, and the Elderly Population.
Hribar M, Hristov H, Lavrisa Z, Korousic Seljak B, Gregoric M, Blaznik U Nutrients. 2021; 13(10).
PMID: 34684529 PMC: 8537619. DOI: 10.3390/nu13103528.