» Articles » PMID: 28366441

Narrow-band Imaging Versus White Light Versus Mapping Biopsy for Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: a Prospective Blinded Trial

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 4
PMID 28366441
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) is a gastric cancer precursor. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) may improve detection of GIM. We compared detection of GIM with high-definition white-light (HD-WL) endoscopy, NBI, and mapping biopsies in a population with increased gastric cancer risk.

Methods: Patients undergoing upper endoscopy had HD-WL examination by 1 endoscopist, followed by an NBI examination by a second endoscopist blinded to HD-WL findings. The location of abnormalities detected by HD-WL and NBI were recorded by a research coordinator, and targeted biopsies of abnormal areas were performed after NBI. Subsequently, 5 mapping biopsies were performed per patient. Biopsy specimens were read by a pathologist blinded to mode of acquisition. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with GIM.

Results: We enrolled 112 patients: 107 (96%) were Hispanic or Asian, and 34 (30%) had GIM. Higher proportions of patients with GIM were detected by NBI (22/34 [65%]) and mapping (26/34 [76%]) versus HD-WL (10/34 [29%]) (P < .005 for both comparisons). GIM was detected by NBI in only 6 patients and only by mapping biopsy in 10 patients; no patient had GIM detected solely by HD-WL. Higher proportions of sites with GIM also were detected with NBI (30/57 [53%]) and mapping biopsies (38/57 [67%]) than HD-WL (16/57 [28%]) (P < .005 for both comparisons). The median number of biopsies per patient with mapping biopsies (5) was significantly higher than with NBI (2) or HD-WL (1).

Conclusions: HD-WL endoscopy is insufficient for detection of GIM in patients at increased risk for gastric cancer. NBI-targeted biopsies plus mapping biopsies should be used. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02197351.).

Citing Articles

Endoscopic Grading and Sampling of Gastric Precancerous Lesions: A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Tziatzios G, Ziogas D, Gkolfakis P, Papadopoulos V, Papaefthymiou A, Mathou N Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(7):3923-3938.

PMID: 39057162 PMC: 11276348. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31070290.


Implementation of the updated Sydney system biopsy protocol improves the diagnostic yield of gastric preneoplastic conditions: Results from a real-world study.

Latorre G, Vargas J, Shah S, Ivanovic-Zuvic D, Achurra P, Fritzsche M Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 47(8):793-803.

PMID: 37598725 PMC: 10875143. DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.08.005.


Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: Challenges and the Opportunity for Precision Prevention.

Tjandra D, Busuttil R, Boussioutas A Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568729 PMC: 10417197. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153913.


Adequacy of endoscopic recognition and surveillance of gastric intestinal metaplasia and atrophic gastritis: A multicentre retrospective study in low incidence countries.

Honing J, Tan W, Dieninyte E, ODonovan M, Brosens L, Weusten B PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0287587.

PMID: 37352223 PMC: 10289343. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287587.


Diagnostic validity and learning curve of non-NBI expert endoscopists in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis.

Tiankanon K, Pittayanon R, Faknak N, Sirimongkolkasem J, Rattanachaisit P, Lerttanatum N Surg Endosc. 2023; 37(9):6771-6778.

PMID: 37226035 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10123-9.