» Articles » PMID: 28364146

Bundled Payments in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Spine Surgery

Overview
Date 2017 Apr 2
PMID 28364146
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: The goal of this manuscript is to provide an overview and analysis of bundled payment models for joint replacement and select spine procedures. Advantages and disadvantages of bundled payment models will be discussed.

Recent Findings: In select populations, bundled payment models have been shown to reduce costs while maintaining satisfactory outcomes. These models have not been tested with complex patient cohorts, such as older adults with fragility hip fractures, and limited data exist with bundled payment analysis in spine procedures. The reduction of healthcare costs, satisfactory patient outcomes, and favorable payments to healthcare systems can be achieved through bundled payments. Modifications of existing bundled payment models should be critically tested prior to implementation across higher risk populations. Bundled payment models will also require healthcare systems to define what services are necessary for an episode of care regarding a specific condition or disease.

Citing Articles

A cost-reducing reimbursement programme? Effects of value-based reimbursement on healthcare costs.

Eriksson T, Tropp H, Wirehn A, Levin L Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1326067.

PMID: 39722715 PMC: 11668751. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1326067.


Higher complication and readmission rates after total knee arthroplasty with discharge to inpatient facility vs. home: a propensity score matched analysis.

Whitaker S, Cole S, Peri M, Ernst B, ONeill C, Satalich J J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):806.

PMID: 39609918 PMC: 11603797. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05294-7.


Delta hemoglobin cutoffs do not predict readmission in patients undergoing primary simultaneous bilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study.

Khan I, Kahlon S, Theosmy E, Ciesielka K, Fillingham Y J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2024; 49:102334.

PMID: 38333745 PMC: 10847021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102334.


90-Day Bundled Payment Simulation, Health Care Utilization, and Complications following Craniopharyngioma Resection in Adult Patients.

Dietz N, Sharma M, John K, Wang D, Ugiliweneza B, Mokshagundam S J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2022; 83(5):515-525.

PMID: 36097499 PMC: 9462965. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740395.


Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019.

Upfill-Brown A, Hsiue P, Sekimura T, Shi B, Ahlquist S, Patel J Arthroplast Today. 2022; 15:188-195.e6.

PMID: 35774881 PMC: 9237286. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.03.004.


References
1.
Rozell J, Courtney P, Dattilo J, Wu C, Lee G . Should All Patients Be Included in Alternative Payment Models for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty and Total Knee Arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(9 Suppl):45-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.020. View

2.
Rajaee S, Bae H, Kanim L, Delamarter R . Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 37(1):67-76. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820cccfb. View

3.
McGirt M, Godil S, Asher A, Parker S, Devin C . Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015; 39(6):E9. DOI: 10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15335. View

4.
Oren J, Hutzler L, Hunter T, Errico T, Zuckerman J, Bosco J . Decreasing spine implant costs and inter-physician cost variation: the impact of programme of cost containment on implant expenditure in spinal surgery. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(8):1102-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35333. View

5.
Clair A, Evangelista P, Lajam C, Slover J, Bosco J, Iorio R . Cost Analysis of Total Joint Arthroplasty Readmissions in a Bundled Payment Care Improvement Initiative. J Arthroplasty. 2016; 31(9):1862-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.02.029. View