» Articles » PMID: 28363264

Evaluating Community-Academic Partnerships of the South Carolina Healthy Brain Research Network

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2017 Apr 2
PMID 28363264
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Community-academic partnerships have a long history of support from public health researchers and practitioners as an effective way to advance research and solutions to issues that are of concern to communities and their citizens. Data on the development and evaluation of partnerships focused on healthy aging and cognitive health were limited. The purpose of this article is to examine how community partners view the benefits and barriers of a community-academic partner group established to support activities of the South Carolina Healthy Brain Research Network (SC-HBRN). The SC-HBRN is part of the national Healthy Brain Research Network, a thematic research network funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). It is focused on improving the scientific and research translation agenda on cognitive health and healthy aging. Semistructured interviews, conducted at end of Year 2 of the 5-year partnership, were used to collect data from partners of the SC-HBRN. Reported benefits of the partnership were information sharing and networking, reaching a broader audience, and humanizing research. When asked to describe what they perceived as barriers to the collaborative, partners described some lack of clarity regarding goals of the network and opportunities to contribute to the partnership. Study results can guide and strengthen other public health-focused partnerships.

Citing Articles

Evaluation and lessons learned from the dissemination and implementation science scholars program in the national cancer prevention and control research network.

Friedman D, Escoffery C, Morrato E, Thomson C, Petagna C, Hucek F J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e181.

PMID: 39655019 PMC: 11626604. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.625.


Development of a Clinical-Academic-Community Collaboration to Improve Health Literacy.

Friedman D, Arent M, Yelton B, Sakhuja M, Haynes V, Noblet S J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11:2150132720957440.

PMID: 32909496 PMC: 7495516. DOI: 10.1177/2150132720957440.

References
1.
Elo S, Kyngas H . The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 62(1):107-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. View

2.
Tandon S, Phillips K, Bordeaux B, Bone L, Brown P, Cagney K . A vision for progress in community health partnerships. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010; 1(1):11-30. DOI: 10.1353/cpr.0.0007. View

3.
Seifer S . Building and sustaining community-institutional partnerships for prevention research: findings from a national collaborative. J Urban Health. 2006; 83(6):989-1003. PMC: 3261296. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-006-9113-y. View

4.
Wilcox S, Altpeter M, Anderson L, Belza B, Bryant L, Jones D . The healthy aging research network: resources for building capacity for public health and aging practice. Am J Health Promot. 2013; 28(1):2-6. PMC: 4540331. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.121116-CIT-564. View

5.
Macaulay A, Commanda L, FREEMAN W, Gibson N, McCabe M, ROBBINS C . Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. BMJ. 1999; 319(7212):774-8. PMC: 1116604. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.774. View