» Articles » PMID: 28362806

Evolved Genetic and Phenotypic Differences Due to Mitochondrial-nuclear Interactions

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2017 Apr 1
PMID 28362806
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) pathway is responsible for most aerobic ATP production and is the only pathway with both nuclear and mitochondrial encoded proteins. The importance of the interactions between these two genomes has recently received more attention because of their potential evolutionary effects and how they may affect human health and disease. In many different organisms, healthy nuclear and mitochondrial genome hybrids between species or among distant populations within a species affect fitness and OxPhos functions. However, what is less understood is whether these interactions impact individuals within a single natural population. The significance of this impact depends on the strength of selection for mito-nuclear interactions. We examined whether mito-nuclear interactions alter allele frequencies for ~11,000 nuclear SNPs within a single, natural Fundulus heteroclitus population containing two divergent mitochondrial haplotypes (mt-haplotypes). Between the two mt-haplotypes, there are significant nuclear allele frequency differences for 349 SNPs with a p-value of 1% (236 with 10% FDR). Unlike the rest of the genome, these 349 outlier SNPs form two groups associated with each mt-haplotype, with a minority of individuals having mixed ancestry. We use this mixed ancestry in combination with mt-haplotype as a polygenic factor to explain a significant fraction of the individual OxPhos variation. These data suggest that mito-nuclear interactions affect cardiac OxPhos function. The 349 outlier SNPs occur in genes involved in regulating metabolic processes but are not directly associated with the 79 nuclear OxPhos proteins. Therefore, we postulate that the evolution of mito-nuclear interactions affects OxPhos function by acting upstream of OxPhos.

Citing Articles

Negative Selection in × Hybrids Indicates Incompatible Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS) Proteins.

Shirak A, Curzon A, Seroussi E, Gershoni M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076713 PMC: 11900210. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052089.


Cichlid fishes are promising underutilized models to investigate helminth-host-microbiome interactions.

Vanhove M, Koblmuller S, Fernandes J, Hahn C, Plusquin M, Kmentova N Front Immunol. 2025; 16:1527184.

PMID: 40018030 PMC: 11864961. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1527184.


Conservation Mitonuclear Replacement: Facilitated mitochondrial adaptation for a changing world.

Iverson E Evol Appl. 2024; 17(3):e13642.

PMID: 38468713 PMC: 10925831. DOI: 10.1111/eva.13642.


Mitochondrial haplotype and mito-nuclear matching drive somatic mutation and selection throughout ageing.

Serrano I, Hirose M, Valentine C, Roesner S, Schmidt E, Pratt G Nat Ecol Evol. 2024; 8(5):1021-1034.

PMID: 38361161 PMC: 11090800. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02338-3.


Mitonuclear interactions modulate nutritional preference.

Camus M, Inwongwan S Biol Lett. 2023; 19(12):20230375.

PMID: 38053364 PMC: 10698477. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0375.


References
1.
Pritchard J, Stephens M, Donnelly P . Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155(2):945-59. PMC: 1461096. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945. View

2.
Rand D, Clark A, Kann L . Sexually antagonistic cytonuclear fitness interactions in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 2001; 159(1):173-87. PMC: 1461777. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/159.1.173. View

3.
Hunt M, Alexson S . The role Acyl-CoA thioesterases play in mediating intracellular lipid metabolism. Prog Lipid Res. 2002; 41(2):99-130. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-7827(01)00017-0. View

4.
Brown A, Kann L, Rand D . Gene flow versus local adaptation in the northern acorn barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides: insights from mitochondrial DNA variation. Evolution. 2002; 55(10):1972-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb01314.x. View

5.
Oleksiak M, Churchill G, Crawford D . Variation in gene expression within and among natural populations. Nat Genet. 2002; 32(2):261-6. DOI: 10.1038/ng983. View