» Articles » PMID: 28362316

Cancer/Testis Antigens: "Smart" Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Prostate and Other Cancers

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2017 Apr 1
PMID 28362316
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A clinical dilemma in the management of prostate cancer (PCa) is to distinguish men with aggressive disease who need definitive treatment from men who may not require immediate intervention. Accurate prediction of disease behavior is critical because radical treatment is associated with high morbidity. Here, we highlight the cancer/testis antigens (CTAs) as potential PCa biomarkers. The CTAs are a group of proteins that are typically restricted to the testis in the normal adult but are aberrantly expressed in several types of cancers. Interestingly, >90% of CTAs are predicted to belong to the realm of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs), which do not have unique structures and exist as highly dynamic conformational ensembles, but are known to play important roles in several biological processes. Using prostate-associated gene 4 (PAGE4) as an example of a disordered CTA, we highlight how IDP conformational dynamics may regulate phenotypic heterogeneity in PCa cells, and how it may be exploited both as a potential biomarker as well as a promising therapeutic target in PCa. We also discuss how in addition to intrinsic disorder and post-translational modifications, structural and functional variability induced in the CTAs by alternate splicing represents an important feature that might have different roles in different cancers. Although it is clear that significant additional work needs to be done in the outlined direction, this novel concept emphasizing (multi)functionality as an important trait in selecting a biomarker underscoring the theranostic potential of CTAs that is latent in their structure (or, more appropriately, the lack thereof), and casts them as next generation or "smart" biomarker candidates.

Citing Articles

The potential value of cancer-testis antigens in ovarian cancer: Prognostic markers and targets for immunotherapy.

Lin L, Zou X, Nong W, Ge Y, Li F, Luo B Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024; 12(6):e1284.

PMID: 38896069 PMC: 11186301. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.1284.


Melanoma Antigen Family A (MAGE A) as Promising Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Bladder Cancer.

Verma S, Swain D, Kushwaha P, Brahmbhatt S, Gupta K, Sundi D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(2).

PMID: 38254738 PMC: 10813664. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020246.


The Prostate-Associated Gene 4 (PAGE4) Could Play a Role in the Development of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia under Oxidative Stress.

Li Y, Liu J, Liu D, Wang Z, Zhou Y, Yang S Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022; 2022:7041739.

PMID: 35633887 PMC: 9135540. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7041739.


Targeting Protein Kinases and Epigenetic Control as Combinatorial Therapy Options for Advanced Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Bagheri S, Rahban M, Bostanian F, Esmaeilzadeh F, Bagherabadi A, Zolghadri S Pharmaceutics. 2022; 14(3).

PMID: 35335890 PMC: 8949110. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14030515.


Implementation of Vaccinomics and In-Silico Approaches to Construct Multimeric Based Vaccine Against Ovarian Cancer.

Sufyan M, Shahid F, Irshad F, Javaid A, Qasim M, Ashfaq U Int J Pept Res Ther. 2021; 27(4):2845-2859.

PMID: 34690620 PMC: 8524215. DOI: 10.1007/s10989-021-10294-w.


References
1.
Rajagopalan K, Mooney S, Parekh N, Getzenberg R, Kulkarni P . A majority of the cancer/testis antigens are intrinsically disordered proteins. J Cell Biochem. 2011; 112(11):3256-67. PMC: 3214731. DOI: 10.1002/jcb.23252. View

2.
Erho N, Crisan A, Vergara I, Mitra A, Ghadessi M, Buerki C . Discovery and validation of a prostate cancer genomic classifier that predicts early metastasis following radical prostatectomy. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6):e66855. PMC: 3691249. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066855. View

3.
Tosoian J, Trock B, Landis P, Feng Z, Epstein J, Partin A . Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29(16):2185-90. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.8112. View

4.
De Jonge N, Garcia-Pino A, Buts L, Haesaerts S, Charlier D, Zangger K . Rejuvenation of CcdB-poisoned gyrase by an intrinsically disordered protein domain. Mol Cell. 2009; 35(2):154-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.025. View

5.
Dyson H, Wright P . Insights into the structure and dynamics of unfolded proteins from nuclear magnetic resonance. Adv Protein Chem. 2002; 62:311-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3233(02)62012-1. View