» Articles » PMID: 28361887

Mechanisms of Social Buffering of Fear in Zebrafish

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2017 Apr 1
PMID 28361887
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Some humans thrive whereas others resign when exposed to threatening situations throughout life. Social support has been identified as an important modulator of these discrepancies in human behaviour, and other social animals also exhibit phenomena in which individuals recover better from aversive events when conspecifics are present - aka social buffering. Here we studied social buffering in zebrafish, by exposing focal fish to an aversive stimulus (alarm substance - AS) either in the absence or presence of conspecific cues. When exposed to AS in the presence of both olfactory (shoal water) and visual (sight of shoal) conspecific cues, focal fish exhibited a lower fear response than when tested alone, demonstrating social buffering in zebrafish. When separately testing each cue's effectiveness, we verified that the visual cue was more effective than the olfactory in reducing freezing in a persistent threat scenario. Finally, we verified that social buffering was independent of shoal size and coincided with a distinct pattern of co-activation of brain regions known to be involved in mammalian social buffering. Thus, this study suggests a shared evolutionary origin for social buffering in vertebrates, bringing new evidence on the behavioural, sensory and neural mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.

Citing Articles

Conserved multisensory integration of social cues in the thalamus.

Anneser L, Kappel J iScience. 2025; 28(1):111678.

PMID: 39868040 PMC: 11761278. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111678.


Social stimuli impact behavioral responses to caffeine in the zebrafish.

Wilson L, Lyttle M, Kanan A, Le A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29645.

PMID: 39609562 PMC: 11605092. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80629-2.


Effects of short-term isolation on social behaviors in prairie voles.

Madrid J, Pranic N, Chu S, Bergstrom J, Singh R, Rabinovich J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313172.

PMID: 39527561 PMC: 11554233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313172.


Possible relations between emotional contagion and social buffering.

Reimert I, Bolhuis J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25944.

PMID: 39472724 PMC: 11522516. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77394-7.


Status-dependent metabolic effects of social interactions in a group-living fish.

Morin A, Culbert B, Mehdi H, Balshine S, Turko A Biol Lett. 2024; 20(7):20240056.

PMID: 39045657 PMC: 11267398. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0056.


References
1.
Bohm U, Prendergast A, Djenoune L, Figueiredo S, Gomez J, Stokes C . CSF-contacting neurons regulate locomotion by relaying mechanical stimuli to spinal circuits. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10866. PMC: 4786674. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10866. View

2.
Orger M, Kampff A, Severi K, Bollmann J, Engert F . Control of visually guided behavior by distinct populations of spinal projection neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11(3):327-33. PMC: 2894808. DOI: 10.1038/nn2048. View

3.
Davis M, Walker D, Miles L, Grillon C . Phasic vs sustained fear in rats and humans: role of the extended amygdala in fear vs anxiety. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009; 35(1):105-35. PMC: 2795099. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2009.109. View

4.
Oliveira R . Mind the fish: zebrafish as a model in cognitive social neuroscience. Front Neural Circuits. 2013; 7:131. PMC: 3737460. DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00131. View

5.
Maximino C, Lima M, Oliveira K, Batista E, Herculano A . "Limbic associative" and "autonomic" amygdala in teleosts: a review of the evidence. J Chem Neuroanat. 2012; 48-49:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2012.10.001. View