» Articles » PMID: 28361477

Effect of Patient Positioning on the Evaluation of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2017 Apr 1
PMID 28361477
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging is usually acquired in supine position. However, some patients are not comfortable in this position for a variety of personal or medical reasons. Our aim was to investigate the effect of patient positioning on quantitative SPECT imaging results using normal supine database.

Methods: 55 patients (mean age 58.5 ± 8.3 years) were enrolled in this prospective study. Each patient had a pair of ECG-gated stress SPECT myocardial perfusion images acquired on two gamma cameras: one in supine position and the other in upright sitting position. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (ED), and end-systolic (ES) left ventricular volumes (V), LV mass, summed stress perfusion defect score (SSS), and total severity score (TSS) were calculated automatically relative to a supine normal reference database.

Results: There were no significant differences in LVEF using the two cameras (0.65 ± 0.08 vs. 0.66 ± 0.10; P > 0.1). However, EDV, ESV, and LV mass were significantly smaller in sitting position than in supine position (89 vs. 80 ml; 33 vs. 29 ml and 115 vs. 109 ml, respectively, all P < 0.0001). On the other hand, SSS and TSS were significantly higher in sitting position than in supine position (5.16 vs. 8.73 and 166.82 vs. 288.27, both P < 0.0001). Overall, more studies in sitting position were interpreted as abnormal than in supine position (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Patient positioning has a significant impact on quantitative gated SPECT imaging results. Using a supine normal reference database, SSS and TSS were larger in sitting position than in supine position. Thus, for imaging in sitting position, separate normal limits are required.

Citing Articles

Prediction of angiographic coronary disease and mortality with a cadmium-zinc-telluride camera: a comparison of upright and supine ejection fractions and left ventricular volumes.

Walker J, Christianson A, Athar M, Waqar F, Gerson M Front Nucl Med. 2024; 3:1162784.

PMID: 39380962 PMC: 11460300. DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1162784.


Performance evaluation of a novel multi-pinhole collimator on triple-NaI-detector SPECT/CT for dedicated myocardial imaging.

Krizsan A, Kukuts K, Al-Muhanna W, Szoboszlai Z, Balazs L, Szabo B EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):24.

PMID: 36964406 PMC: 10039219. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00541-y.


Factors affecting appearance of a normal myocardial perfusion scan.

Slomka P, Germano G J Nucl Cardiol. 2017; 25(5):1655-1657.

PMID: 28361475 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-0857-4.

References
1.
Nishina H, Slomka P, Abidov A, Yoda S, Akincioglu C, Kang X . Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47(1):51-8. View

2.
Mahmarian J, Moye L, Verani M, Bloom M, Pratt C . High reproducibility of myocardial perfusion defects in patients undergoing serial exercise thallium-201 tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1995; 75(16):1116-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80741-3. View

3.
Shaw L, Iskandrian A . Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004; 11(2):171-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2003.12.004. View

4.
Chawla D, Rahaby M, Amin A, Vashistha R, Alyousef T, Martinez H . Soft tissue attenuation patterns in stress myocardial perfusion SPECT images: a comparison between supine and upright acquisition systems. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011; 18(2):281-90. DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9336-x. View

5.
Tout D, Tonge C, Austin P, Adams J, Arumugam P . A comparison between upright and supine myocardial perfusion imaging with attenuation correction. Nucl Med Commun. 2014; 35(8):832-8. DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000129. View