Quality Reporting of Carotid Intima-media Thickness Methodology; Current State of the Science in the Field of Spinal Cord Injury

Overview

Journal J Spinal Cord Med

Date 2017 Mar 31

PMID 28357930

Authors

Jordan D Hoskin

Masae Miyatani

B Catharine Craven

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) may be used increasingly as a cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening tool in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) as other routine invasive diagnostic tests are often unfeasible. However, variation in cIMT acquisition and analysis methods is an issue in the current published literature. The growth of the field is dependent on cIMT quality acquisition and analysis to ensure accurate reporting of CVD risk. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the quality of the reported methodology used to collect cIMT values in SCI.

Methods: Data from 12 studies, which measured cIMT in individuals with SCI, were identified from the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases. The quality of the reported methodologies was scored based on adherence to cIMT methodological guidelines abstracted from two consensus papers.

Results: Five studies were scored as 'moderate quality' in methodological reporting, having specified 9 to 11 of 15 quality reporting criterion. The remaining seven studies were scored as 'low quality', having reported less than 9 of 15 quality reporting criterion. No study had methodological reporting that was scored as 'high quality'. The overall reporting of quality methodology was poor in the published SCI literature.

Conclusions: A greater adherence to current methodological guidelines is needed to advance the field of cIMT in SCI. Further research is necessary to refine cIMT acquisition and analysis guidelines to aid authors designing research and journals in screening manuscripts for publication.

References

Matos-Souza J, Pithon K, Ozahata T, Oliveira R, Teo F, Blotta M . Subclinical atherosclerosis is related to injury level but not to inflammatory parameters in spinal cord injury subjects. Spinal Cord. 2010; 48(10):740-4. DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.12. View

Schmidt-Trucksass A, Schmid A, Brunner C, Scherer N, Zach G, KEUL J . Arterial properties of the carotid and femoral artery in endurance-trained and paraplegic subjects. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000; 89(5):1956-63. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1956. View

Caruso D, Carter W, Cifu D, Carne W . Survival of patients with spinal cord injury after cardiac arrest in Department of Veterans Affairs hospital: Pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014; 51(7):1103-8. DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.05.0119. View

Pelletier C, Miyatani M, Giangregorio L, Craven B . Sarcopenic Obesity in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97(11):1931-1937. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.026. View

Orakzai S, Orakzai R, Ahmadi N, Agrawal N, Bauman W, Yee F . Measurement of coronary artery calcification by electron beam computerized tomography in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: evidence for increased atherosclerotic burden. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45(12):775-9. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102045. View

Wikstrand J . Methodological considerations of ultrasound measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness and lumen diameter. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007; 27(6):341-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2007.00757.x. View

Peters S, Bots M . Carotid intima-media thickness studies: study design and data analysis. J Stroke. 2013; 15(1):38-48. PMC: 3779675. DOI: 10.5853/jos.2013.15.1.38. View

von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(12):1495-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013. View

Laurent S, Cockcroft J, van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D . Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27(21):2588-605. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254. View

10.

Pignoli P, Tremoli E, Poli A, Oreste P, Paoletti R . Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986; 74(6):1399-406. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399. View

11.

Myers J, Lee M, Kiratli J . Cardiovascular disease in spinal cord injury: an overview of prevalence, risk, evaluation, and management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 86(2):142-52. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802f0247. View

12.

Schmidt C, Wendelhag I . How can the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima-media thickness be reduced? Studies of interobserver variability in carotid and femoral arteries. Clin Physiol. 1999; 19(1):45-55. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1999.00145.x. View

13.

Bell J, Chen D, Bahls M, Newcomer S . Evidence for greater burden of peripheral arterial disease in lower extremity arteries of spinal cord-injured individuals. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011; 301(3):H766-72. PMC: 3191090. DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00507.2011. View

14.

Thijssen D, De Groot P, van den Bogerd A, Veltmeijer M, Cable N, Green D . Time course of arterial remodelling in diameter and wall thickness above and below the lesion after a spinal cord injury. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012; 112(12):4103-9. PMC: 3496545. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2400-2. View

15.

Touboul P, Grobbee D, den Ruijter H . Assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis by carotid intima media thickness: technical issues. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 19(2 Suppl):18-24. DOI: 10.1177/2047487312448990. View

16.

Matos-Souza J, de Rossi G, Costa E Silva A, Azevedo E, Pithon K, Schreiber R . Impact of Adapted Sports Activities on the Progression of Carotid Atherosclerosis in Subjects With Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 97(6):1034-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.002. View

17.

Matos-Souza J, Pithon K, Ozahata T, Gemignani T, Cliquet Jr A, Nadruz Jr W . Carotid intima-media thickness is increased in patients with spinal cord injury independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Atherosclerosis. 2008; 202(1):29-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.04.013. View

18.

Meijer R, Grobee D, Bots M . Mannheim consensus on carotid intima-media thickness: opposite and complementary points of view. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006; 21(5-6):415-6. DOI: 10.1159/000092129. View

19.

Matos-Souza J, Silva A, Campos L, Goulart D, Schreiber R, de Rossi G . Physical activity is associated with improved subclinical atherosclerosis in spinal cord injury subjects independent of variation in traditional risk factors. Int J Cardiol. 2012; 167(2):592-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.222. View

20.

den Ruijter H, Peters S, Anderson T, Britton A, Dekker J, Eijkemans M . Common carotid intima-media thickness measurements in cardiovascular risk prediction: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012; 308(8):796-803. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2012.9630. View