» Articles » PMID: 28357500

Diversion Colitis 25 years Later: the Phenomenon of the Disease

Overview
Date 2017 Mar 31
PMID 28357500
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Diversion colitis (DC) seems to be common in stoma patients, and the restoration of the continuity of the digestive tract is crucial for relief from the inflammatory process. No prospective studies of the late effects of DC on the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract mucosa and the clinical condition of patients have been reported.

Methods: Data from 23 patients who underwent stoma creation were analysed during the reversal period (A) and at an average of 3 months (B1) and 5.6 years (B2) after restoration of GI tract continuity. Every monitoring visit included endoscopy, histology and assessment of the clinical condition of patients.

Results: Shortly after GI tract restoration (B1), a significant decrease in inflammation was observed. The Ki67 positivity percentage increased, but this was not significant. At an average of 5.6 years after restoration (group B2), the clinical symptoms were mild. More patients presented with endoscopically detected inflammation of the mucosa, but its severity was not significantly higher than that at 3 months after reversal. Histological inflammation was more common, and its severity was significantly higher than that shortly after reversal but similar to that before reversal. The Ki67 positivity percentage decreased at the last examination (B2).

Conclusions: The results of this study show a complex recurrence of histological inflammation several years after GI tract restoration but without clinical and endoscopic inflammation and with good clinical condition. DC can potentially have a late influence on the rectal mucosa, even after stoma closure.

Citing Articles

Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus? A prospective multicenter pilot study.

Ocana J, Garcia-Perez J, Labalde-Martinez M, Rodriguez-Velasco G, Moreno I, Vivas A Tech Coloproctol. 2022; 26(8):645-653.

PMID: 35596903 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02620-1.


The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: A retrospective cohort study.

Turner G, Clifford K, Holloway R, Woodfield J, Thompson-Fawcett M Colorectal Dis. 2022; 24(7):854-861.

PMID: 35156285 PMC: 9545668. DOI: 10.1111/codi.16095.


Long-term outcome of indwelling colon observed seven years after radical resection for rectosigmoid cancer: A case report.

Zhuang Z, Wei M, Yang X, Zhang Y, Zhuang W, Wang Z World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9(19):5252-5258.

PMID: 34307575 PMC: 8283588. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i19.5252.


Diversion Colitis and Probiotic Stimulation: Effects of Bowel Stimulation Prior to Ileostomy Closure.

Rodriguez-Padilla A, Morales-Martin G, Perez-Quintero R, Rada-Morgades R, Gomez-Salgado J, Ruiz-Frutos C Front Med (Lausanne). 2021; 8:654573.

PMID: 34249962 PMC: 8267790. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.654573.


Serological Biomarkers and Diversion Colitis: Changes after Stimulation with Probiotics.

Rodriguez-Padilla A, Morales-Martin G, Perez-Quintero R, Gomez-Salgado J, Ruiz-Frutos C Biomolecules. 2021; 11(5).

PMID: 34063276 PMC: 8147466. DOI: 10.3390/biom11050684.


References
1.
Giardiello F, Lazenby A, Bayless T . The new colitides, Collagenous, lymphocytic, and diversion colitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1995; 24(3):717-29. View

2.
Szczepkowski M, Banasiewicz T, Krokowicz P, Dziki A, Wallner G, Drews M . Polish consensus statement on the protective stoma. Pol Przegl Chir. 2014; 86(8):391-404. DOI: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0071. View

3.
Glotzer D, Glick M, Goldman H . Proctitis and colitis following diversion of the fecal stream. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80(3):438-41. View

4.
Tortora A, Purchiaroni F, Scarpellini E, Ojetti V, Gabrielli M, Vitale G . Colitides. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012; 16(13):1795-805. View

5.
Harig J, SOERGEL K, Komorowski R, Wood C . Treatment of diversion colitis with short-chain-fatty acid irrigation. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198901053200105. View