» Articles » PMID: 28356729

Measures of Bronchodilator Response of FEV, FVC and SVC in a Swedish General Population Sample Aged 50-64 Years, the SCAPIS Pilot Study

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2017 Mar 31
PMID 28356729
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Data are lacking from general population studies on how to define changes in lung function after bronchodilation. This study aimed to analyze different measures of bronchodilator response of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV), forced vital capacity (FVC) and slow vital capacity (SVC).

Materials And Methods: Data were derived from the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimage Study (SCAPIS) Pilot study. This analysis comprised 1,050 participants aged 50-64 years from the general population. Participants were investigated using a questionnaire, and FEV, FVC and SVC were recorded before and 15 minutes after inhalation of 400 µg of salbutamol. A bronchodilator response was defined as the relative change from baseline value expressed as the difference in units of percent predicted normal. Predictors of bronchodilator responses were assessed using multiple linear regression models. Airway obstruction was defined as FEV/FVC ratio below lower limit of normal (LLN) before bronchodilation, and COPD was defined as an FEV/FVC ratio below LLN after bronchodilation. Physician-diagnosed asthma was defined as an affirmative answer to "Have you ever had asthma diagnosed by a physician?". Asymptomatic never-smokers were defined as those not reporting physician-diagnosed asthma, physician-diagnosed COPD or emphysema, current wheeze or chronic bronchitis and being a lifelong never-smoker.

Results: Among all subjects, the greatest bronchodilator responses (FEV, FVC and SVC) were found in subjects with asthma or COPD. The upper 95th percentile of bronchodilator responses in asymptomatic never-smokers was 8.7% for FEV, 4.2% for FVC and 5.0% for SVC. The bronchodilator responses were similar between men and women. In a multiple linear regression model comprising all asymptomatic never-smokers, the bronchodilator response of FEV was significantly associated with airway obstruction and height.

Conclusion: When the bronchodilator response in asymptomatic never-smokers is reported as the difference in units of predicted normal, significant reversibility of FEV, FVC and SVC to bronchodilators is ~9%, 4% and 5%, respectively.

Citing Articles

Bronchodilator Response in Post-COVID-19 Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Krooss S, Klefenz I, Ott M, Klawonn F, Leitl D, Schneeberger T Respiration. 2024; 103(10):622-629.

PMID: 39008969 PMC: 11446304. DOI: 10.1159/000540297.


Effect of Smoking on Lung Function Decline in a Retrospective Study of a Health Examination Population in Chinese Males.

Tian T, Jiang X, Qin R, Ding Y, Yu C, Xu X Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 9:843162.

PMID: 36687452 PMC: 9853193. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.843162.


Clinical value of bronchodilator response for diagnosing asthma in steroid-naïve adults.

Tuomisto L, Ilmarinen P, Lehtimaki L, Niemela O, Tommola M, Kankaanranta H ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(4).

PMID: 34912880 PMC: 8666574. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00293-2021.


Bronchodilator reversibility as a diagnostic test for adult asthma: findings from the population-based Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study.

Tan D, Lodge C, Lowe A, Bui D, Bowatte G, Johns D ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(1).

PMID: 33585659 PMC: 7869605. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00042-2020.


Effects of treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) on lung function improvement in patients with bronchiectasis: an observational study.

Lee S, Lee J, Lee S, Oh Y J Thorac Dis. 2021; 13(1):169-177.

PMID: 33569197 PMC: 7867804. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-1282.


References
1.
Murgia N, Brisman J, Claesson A, Muzi G, Olin A, Toren K . Validity of a questionnaire-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a general population-based study. BMC Pulm Med. 2014; 14:49. PMC: 3994476. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-49. View

2.
Lorber D, Kaltenborn W, Burrows B . Responses to isoproterenol in a general population sample. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1978; 118(5):855-61. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1978.118.5.855. View

3.
Ward H, Cooper B, Miller M . Improved criterion for assessing lung function reversibility. Chest. 2015; 148(4):877-886. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-2413. View

4.
Ronmark E, Ekerljung L, Lotvall J, Toren K, Ronmark E, Lundback B . Large scale questionnaire survey on respiratory health in Sweden: effects of late- and non-response. Respir Med. 2009; 103(12):1807-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.07.014. View

5.
Calverley P, Albert P, Walker P . Bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: use and limitations. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 1(7):564-73. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70086-9. View